Author | Topic |
Location: Melbourne
Registered: November 2003
|
Re: dukes of hazard
|
Wed, 28 September 2005 03:48
|
|
st184 sillycar wrote on Wed, 28 September 2005 13:46 |
Shraka wrote on Wed, 28 September 2005 13:44 |
st184 sillycar wrote on Wed, 28 September 2005 13:09 | I thought it was fairly good . . . Not that I can remember the T.V. series particularly well. I was relieved that the writers/director used Jessica Simpson as eye-candy and NOTHING ELSE !
I thought alot of the jumps while overdone, were pretty "entertaining" - if only for the cringe-factor when you realise that ANOTHER Charger was about to be completely written off ! ! ! SOO many jumps in the film were obviously on their way to ending badly, with the main shot cut short, with another angle showing the landing..
Anyone know how many General Lee's died to make the movie?
|
Dunno, but if you watch the out-takes, the jump onto the freeway ends badly when the suspension hits the bump stops and the stunt man loses controll of the car and spins into a barrier. Also, the first jump over the closed bridge ends up with the car doing a nose dive and landing face first then flipping upside down. So atleast 2 died to make the movie (although the jump onto the freeway crash may have been recoverable).
|
I think half the reason so many of the awkward landings ended so badly is that all the BIG jumps were done Via. remote control - MythBusters style from a chase-car ! !
|
They where?! Wholy crap, no wonder the driver couldn't keep controll.
|
|
|
| Subject | Poster | Date |
|
dukes of hazard
|
b1gb3n | Thu, 22 September 2005 17:46 |
|
Re: dukes of hazard
|
sated | Thu, 22 September 2005 19:45 |
|
Re: dukes of hazard
|
feral4mr2 | Thu, 22 September 2005 20:52 |
|
Re: dukes of hazard
|
Mr DOHC | Thu, 22 September 2005 21:19 |
|
Re: dukes of hazard
|
Cool1 | Thu, 22 September 2005 21:27 |
|
Re: dukes of hazard
|
white86 | Thu, 22 September 2005 21:38 |
|
Re: dukes of hazard
|
StockAE86 | Thu, 22 September 2005 23:09 |
|
Re: dukes of hazard
|
Shraka | Thu, 22 September 2005 23:40 |
|
Re: dukes of hazard
|
ae86drift | Sat, 24 September 2005 15:15 |
|
Re: dukes of hazard
|
puzzle man | Fri, 23 September 2005 00:08 |
|
Re: dukes of hazard
|
unforgiven | Fri, 23 September 2005 04:44 |
|
Re: dukes of hazard
|
ke382TG | Fri, 23 September 2005 04:50 |
|
Re: dukes of hazard
|
Cool1 | Fri, 23 September 2005 06:46 |
|
Re: dukes of hazard
|
Jorrs | Sat, 24 September 2005 02:05 |
|
Re: dukes of hazard
|
Daemon | Sat, 24 September 2005 05:58 |
|
Re: dukes of hazard
|
paulst162 | Sat, 24 September 2005 10:49 |
|
Re: dukes of hazard
|
TRD-GTI | Sat, 24 September 2005 12:16 |
|
Re: dukes of hazard
|
Mookie | Sun, 25 September 2005 06:41 |
|
Re: dukes of hazard
|
illuminatus | Mon, 26 September 2005 00:04 |
|
Re: dukes of hazard
|
st184 sillycar | Wed, 28 September 2005 03:09 |
|
Re: dukes of hazard
|
Shraka | Wed, 28 September 2005 03:44 |
|
Re: dukes of hazard
|
st184 sillycar | Wed, 28 September 2005 03:46 |
|
Re: dukes of hazard
|
Shraka | Wed, 28 September 2005 03:48 |
|
Re: dukes of hazard
|
cannonball | Wed, 28 September 2005 04:37 |
|
Re: dukes of hazard
|
b1gb3n | Wed, 28 September 2005 03:50 |
|
Re: dukes of hazard
|
Shraka | Wed, 28 September 2005 03:56 |
|
Re: dukes of hazard
|
Skip | Thu, 29 September 2005 00:32 |
|
Re: dukes of hazard
|
b1gb3n | Wed, 28 September 2005 03:59 |
|
Re: dukes of hazard
|
Shraka | Wed, 28 September 2005 04:01 |
|
Re: dukes of hazard
|
Corona RT142 | Wed, 28 September 2005 04:41 |
|
Re: dukes of hazard
|
puzzle man | Thu, 29 September 2005 04:27 |
|
Re: dukes of hazard
|
tom210 | Thu, 29 September 2005 10:40 |
|
Re: dukes of hazard
|
Mookie | Wed, 28 September 2005 05:11 |
|
Re: dukes of hazard
|
st184 sillycar | Wed, 28 September 2005 05:56 |