| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
Land of Oz
Registered:
June 2004
|
|
Re: LOL@ conspiracy theorists :D
|
Sun, 23 October 2005 11:49
 
|
 |
Hi,
I love conspiracy theories. Not so much the theories themselves, but to witness the polarised views of the two opposing sides. One side has the gullible beleivers and the other side has the head-in-the-sand non-beleivers. Both, in their own way are fanatical and amusing.
I like to flit between the two camps to ensure my fanaticism is spread evenly. 
Now, I just saw a documentary on "faked moon landing" and it was very interesting. But, what I don't get is, if it was all faked then it would of taken thousands of people to be in the "know". How do you stop all those people from talking. Also, any transmissions would not be coming from the moon and therefore Parkes, Joderall Bank and the countless other radio telescopes would not of picked up anything, unless they bullshitted and were in on the scam.
Why can't they just point Hubble at the moon and take a few close up pics? Hubble is certainly powerful enough to see if there's any debri and lunar modules and stuff like that left behind. Even Palomar might be able to spot something - I think it spotted the tracks made by Lunakhood (or whatever it was called).
Damn, if I was in Sydney I'd get out my telescopes and have a squizz! 
Hmmm, I'm going to have to ponder on this one for a bit.
seeyuzz
river
|
|
|
| | Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|
 |
LOL@ conspiracy theorists :D
|
oldcorollas | Sat, 22 October 2005 16:45 |
|
Re: LOL@ conspiracy theorists :D
|
b1gb3n | Sat, 22 October 2005 16:54 |
|
Re: LOL@ conspiracy theorists :D
|
oldcorollas | Sat, 22 October 2005 16:58 |
|
Re: LOL@ conspiracy theorists :D
|
oldcorollas | Sat, 22 October 2005 17:01 |
|
Re: LOL@ conspiracy theorists :D
|
oldcorollas | Sat, 22 October 2005 17:04 |
|
Re: LOL@ conspiracy theorists :D
|
oldcorollas | Sat, 22 October 2005 17:06 |
|
Re: LOL@ conspiracy theorists :D
|
b1gb3n | Sat, 22 October 2005 17:06 |
|
Re: LOL@ conspiracy theorists :D
|
oldcorollas | Sat, 22 October 2005 17:30 |
|
Re: LOL@ conspiracy theorists :D
|
Corona RT142 | Sun, 23 October 2005 03:09 |
|
Re: LOL@ conspiracy theorists :D
|
gianttomato | Sat, 22 October 2005 16:56 |
|
Re: LOL@ conspiracy theorists :D
|
b1gb3n | Sat, 22 October 2005 17:37 |
|
Re: LOL@ conspiracy theorists :D
|
oldcorollas | Sat, 22 October 2005 17:39 |
|
Re: LOL@ conspiracy theorists :D
|
b1gb3n | Sat, 22 October 2005 17:49 |
|
Re: LOL@ conspiracy theorists :D
|
kingmick | Sat, 22 October 2005 22:41 |
|
Re: LOL@ conspiracy theorists :D
|
kingmick | Sat, 22 October 2005 22:55 |
|
Re: LOL@ conspiracy theorists :D
|
thechuckster | Sun, 23 October 2005 04:25 |
|
Re: LOL@ conspiracy theorists :D
|
shinybluesteel | Sun, 23 October 2005 06:13 |
|
Re: LOL@ conspiracy theorists :D
|
river | Sun, 23 October 2005 11:49 |
|
Re: LOL@ conspiracy theorists :D
|
Bill Sherwood | Sun, 23 October 2005 13:38 |
|
Re: LOL@ conspiracy theorists :D
|
gianttomato | Sun, 23 October 2005 23:06 |
|
Re: LOL@ conspiracy theorists :D
|
river | Sun, 23 October 2005 23:46 |
|
Re: LOL@ conspiracy theorists :D
|
gianttomato | Mon, 24 October 2005 00:04 |
|
Re: LOL@ conspiracy theorists :D
|
Shraka | Mon, 24 October 2005 00:18 |
|
Re: LOL@ conspiracy theorists :D
|
gianttomato | Mon, 24 October 2005 00:39 |
|
Re: LOL@ conspiracy theorists :D
|
Eighty-6^ | Sun, 23 October 2005 12:17 |
|
Re: LOL@ conspiracy theorists :D
|
ed_ma61 | Sun, 23 October 2005 23:29 |
|
Re: LOL@ conspiracy theorists :D
|
draven | Mon, 24 October 2005 00:42 |
