Author | Topic |

Location: Sydney
Registered: October 2004
|
Re: RTA too stoopid
|
Fri, 02 December 2005 05:03
|
 |
Corona RT142 wrote on Fri, 02 December 2005 15:57 | Your suggestion is great and in an ideal world they would be great, however we don't live in one and thus they'd never work. It'd be too hard to do. Think about how many p-platers they're is in NSw about 400,000, now how many advanced driver training courses are they'e, about 4 all running out of 2 main tracks being Eastern creek and Oran park.
Their is no way they could handle the amount of extra business. ATM in my area there is up to a 3 month wait just to book for your p's test and thats with how many RTA's around, as I said its a great idea as are many others in theory. But when you look at the practical side of applying them they just won't work.
|
Yups only problem being not practical, hence we got the overal P platers banned from turbo. It sucks, i mean if there is ony 1 year in red p before you get your full license, i think i can understand it, but 3 years total in red+green P, it kindda sucks.
And i never got the objective of green P, i still see a lot of dangerous green P drivers out there on the roads, lol they just did the green P to perhaps raise the number of bucks they can make in a year.
|
|
|
| Subject | Poster | Date |
 |
RTA too stoopid
|
Les | Wed, 30 November 2005 03:59 |
 |
Re: RTA too stoopid
|
ke382TG | Wed, 30 November 2005 04:01 |
 |
Re: RTA too stoopid
|
h3ff44 | Wed, 30 November 2005 04:08 |
 |
Re: RTA too stoopid
|
Corona RT142 | Wed, 30 November 2005 04:12 |
 |
Re: RTA too stoopid
|
Corona RT142 | Wed, 30 November 2005 04:09 |
 |
Re: RTA too stoopid
|
EvilJack | Wed, 30 November 2005 04:29 |
 |
Re: RTA too stoopid
|
Les | Wed, 30 November 2005 05:49 |
 |
Re: RTA too stoopid
|
bloody_huge23 | Wed, 30 November 2005 05:31 |
 |
Re: RTA too stoopid
|
rthy | Wed, 30 November 2005 06:05 |
 |
Re: RTA too stoopid
|
Corona RT142 | Wed, 30 November 2005 06:14 |
 |
Re: RTA too stoopid
|
Corona RT142 | Wed, 30 November 2005 05:53 |
 |
Re: RTA too stoopid
|
h3ff44 | Wed, 30 November 2005 06:15 |
 |
Re: RTA too stoopid
|
hokey | Wed, 30 November 2005 21:58 |
 |
Re: RTA too stoopid
|
havabeer | Wed, 30 November 2005 11:11 |
 |
Re: RTA too stoopid
|
Corona RT142 | Wed, 30 November 2005 21:54 |
 |
Re: RTA too stoopid
|
coFF33 | Wed, 30 November 2005 22:33 |
 |
Re: RTA too stoopid
|
Corona RT142 | Wed, 30 November 2005 22:44 |
 |
Re: RTA too stoopid
|
Les | Wed, 30 November 2005 22:56 |
 |
Re: RTA too stoopid
|
Corona RT142 | Wed, 30 November 2005 23:11 |
 |
Re: RTA too stoopid
|
Les | Wed, 30 November 2005 23:52 |
 |
Re: RTA too stoopid
|
Corona RT142 | Thu, 01 December 2005 00:00 |
 |
Re: RTA too stoopid
|
Les | Thu, 01 December 2005 00:33 |
 |
Re: RTA too stoopid
|
havabeer | Thu, 01 December 2005 00:47 |
 |
Re: RTA too stoopid
|
Corona RT142 | Thu, 01 December 2005 00:54 |
 |
Re: RTA too stoopid
|
thu187 | Thu, 01 December 2005 00:48 |
 |
Re: RTA too stoopid
|
Les | Thu, 01 December 2005 00:51 |
 |
Re: RTA too stoopid
|
Corona RT142 | Thu, 01 December 2005 00:49 |
 |
Re: RTA too stoopid
|
tom210 | Thu, 01 December 2005 00:50 |
 |
Re: RTA too stoopid
|
havabeer | Thu, 01 December 2005 01:43 |
 |
Re: RTA too stoopid
|
rthy | Thu, 01 December 2005 03:54 |
 |
Re: RTA too stoopid
|
Corona RT142 | Thu, 01 December 2005 03:58 |
 |
Re: RTA too stoopid
|
Corona RT142 | Thu, 01 December 2005 02:44 |
 |
Re: RTA too stoopid
|
st184 sillycar | Thu, 01 December 2005 05:22 |
 |
Re: RTA too stoopid
|
alliance_22 | Thu, 01 December 2005 05:43 |
 |
Re: RTA too stoopid
|
Gerald1 | Fri, 02 December 2005 01:32 |
 |
Re: RTA too stoopid
|
alliance_22 | Fri, 02 December 2005 03:50 |
 |
Re: RTA too stoopid
|
-=DV=- | Thu, 01 December 2005 07:15 |
 |
Re: RTA too stoopid
|
Corona RT142 | Fri, 02 December 2005 04:04 |
 |
Re: RTA too stoopid
|
alliance_22 | Fri, 02 December 2005 04:21 |
 |
Re: RTA too stoopid
|
alliance_22 | Fri, 02 December 2005 04:44 |
 |
Re: RTA too stoopid
|
Corona RT142 | Fri, 02 December 2005 04:57 |
 |
Re: RTA too stoopid
|
alliance_22 | Fri, 02 December 2005 05:03 |