| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
Brisbane
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: Question on 1G conv. for TA & RA23
|
Mon, 03 March 2003 05:29
|
 |
The mid-rear sump definitely won't fit; the RT142 crossmember requires a front sump. What I meant was, after this discussion of different front-sump configurations, should I be looking for a specific model which will clear the swaybar? From your post it sounds like the swaybar will have to go, which is what I kinda suspected. 
|
|
|
| | Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|
 |
Question on 1G conv. for TA & RA23
|
manipulate | Wed, 26 February 2003 10:59 |
|
Re: Question on 1G conv. for TA & RA23
|
Cool1 | Wed, 26 February 2003 11:27 |
|
Re: Question on 1G conv. for TA & RA23
|
Nark | Wed, 26 February 2003 11:30 |
|
Re: Question on 1G conv. for TA & RA23
|
Cool1 | Wed, 26 February 2003 11:35 |
|
Re: Question on 1G conv. for TA & RA23
|
GEEZE23 | Wed, 26 February 2003 11:52 |
|
Re: Question on 1G conv. for TA & RA23
|
Cool1 | Wed, 26 February 2003 11:55 |
|
Re: Question on 1G conv. for TA & RA23
|
CrAiGzEE | Thu, 27 February 2003 04:08 |
|
Re: Question on 1G conv. for TA & RA23
|
eastie | Thu, 27 February 2003 06:18 |
|
Re: Question on 1G conv. for TA & RA23
|
Cool1 | Thu, 27 February 2003 07:40 |
|
Re: Question on 1G conv. for TA & RA23
|
manipulate | Thu, 27 February 2003 08:09 |
|
Re: Question on 1G conv. for TA & RA23
|
CrAiGzEE | Thu, 27 February 2003 11:22 |
|
Re: Question on 1G conv. for TA & RA23
|
Cool1 | Thu, 27 February 2003 11:27 |
|
Re: Question on 1G conv. for TA & RA23
|
GEEZE23 | Sun, 02 March 2003 01:40 |
|
Re: Question on 1G conv. for TA & RA23
|
Nark | Sun, 02 March 2003 23:41 |
|
Re: Question on 1G conv. for TA & RA23
|
Norbie | Sun, 02 March 2003 23:56 |
|
Re: Question on 1G conv. for TA & RA23
|
Nark | Mon, 03 March 2003 00:52 |
|
Re: Question on 1G conv. for TA & RA23
|
ddeane | Mon, 03 March 2003 05:16 |
|
Re: Question on 1G conv. for TA & RA23
|
Norbie | Mon, 03 March 2003 05:29 |
