| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
Brisbane, QLD, Australia
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: Are Soarers / Sc400s any good?
|
Wed, 02 April 2003 12:24
 
|
 |
| freakysoarer wrote on Wed, 02 April 2003 19:48 |
u can find all the info about the car at the ASLC website.
basically, there are 3 versions of the car.
1)the V8 4Litre aka SC400 Toyota Soarer. available in 3 variety.
the UZZ30, UZZ31 & UZZ32. uses the 1UZ-FE.
2)the NA inline6 3litre aka SC300 Soarer. the JZZ31. uses the 2JZ-GE.
3)the twin turbo inline6 2.5litre Soarer that was never badged as a Lexus. the JZZ30. uses the 1JZ-GTE.
equipment varies with each version, with the v8 with the works and the 2.5TT as a barebone.
however there are 'limited' versions of the 2.5TT known as the GT-TL which still has electric lumbar, wood trim, etc.
hope that satisfies some curiosity... juz my 2c.
|
Ok, Looks like I'll be looking at a JZZ30. I take it they were badged toyota?
They are '92-'95 models?
Also, what is a good list of features to look for? I'm not after one fully loaded, but, what would be a good selection to look for? Like, ABS, LSD, etc, or are those standard?
Thanks.
|
|
|
| | Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|
 |
Are Soarers / Sc400s any good?
|
chrishulbert | Thu, 27 March 2003 07:43 |
|
Re: Are Soarers / Sc400s any good?
|
viagra_cressida | Thu, 27 March 2003 10:57 |
|
Re: Are Soarers / Sc400s any good?
|
ae82 16v | Fri, 28 March 2003 00:39 |
|
Re: Are Soarers / Sc400s any good?
|
viagra_cressida | Fri, 28 March 2003 02:52 |
|
Re: Are Soarers / Sc400s any good?
|
freakysoarer | Sat, 29 March 2003 04:12 |
|
Re: Are Soarers / Sc400s any good?
|
chrishulbert | Sat, 29 March 2003 06:17 |
|
Re: Are Soarers / Sc400s any good?
|
Soarin | Sat, 29 March 2003 10:22 |
|
Re: Are Soarers / Sc400s any good?
|
87seca | Sat, 29 March 2003 13:48 |
|
Re: Are Soarers / Sc400s any good?
|
viagra_cressida | Sun, 30 March 2003 07:38 |
|
Re: Are Soarers / Sc400s any good?
|
Classique71 | Sun, 30 March 2003 10:23 |
|
Re: Are Soarers / Sc400s any good?
|
87seca | Sun, 30 March 2003 15:34 |
|
Re: Are Soarers / Sc400s any good?
|
chrishulbert | Mon, 31 March 2003 02:51 |
|
Re: Are Soarers / Sc400s any good?
|
Classique71 | Mon, 31 March 2003 09:23 |
|
Re: Are Soarers / Sc400s any good?
|
rob_RA40 | Mon, 31 March 2003 03:06 |
|
Re: Are Soarers / Sc400s any good?
|
freakysoarer | Mon, 31 March 2003 06:29 |
|
Re: Are Soarers / Sc400s any good?
|
Soarer | Mon, 31 March 2003 13:09 |
|
Re: Are Soarers / Sc400s any good?
|
Soarin | Mon, 31 March 2003 13:31 |
|
Re: Are Soarers / Sc400s any good?
|
Soarer | Tue, 01 April 2003 00:05 |
|
Re: Are Soarers / Sc400s any good?
|
viagra_cressida | Wed, 02 April 2003 05:46 |
|
Re: Are Soarers / Sc400s any good?
|
freakysoarer | Wed, 02 April 2003 06:10 |
|
Re: Are Soarers / Sc400s any good?
|
viagra_cressida | Wed, 02 April 2003 06:20 |
|
Re: Are Soarers / Sc400s any good?
|
freakysoarer | Wed, 02 April 2003 06:28 |
|
Re: Are Soarers / Sc400s any good?
|
Soarin | Wed, 02 April 2003 07:48 |
|
Re: Are Soarers / Sc400s any good?
|
Apollo | Wed, 02 April 2003 08:20 |
|
Re: Are Soarers / Sc400s any good?
|
freakysoarer | Wed, 02 April 2003 09:48 |
|
Re: Are Soarers / Sc400s any good?
|
Apollo | Wed, 02 April 2003 12:24 |
|
Re: Are Soarers / Sc400s any good?
|
freakysoarer | Wed, 02 April 2003 12:43 |
|
Re: Are Soarers / Sc400s any good?
|
viagra_cressida | Wed, 02 April 2003 10:54 |
