Author | Topic |

Location: QLD
Registered: March 2003
|
Re: Are Soarers / Sc400s any good?
|
Wed, 02 April 2003 12:43

|
 |
Apollo wrote on Wed, 02 April 2003 22:24 |
freakysoarer wrote on Wed, 02 April 2003 19:48 | u can find all the info about the car at the ASLC website.
basically, there are 3 versions of the car.
1)the V8 4Litre aka SC400 Toyota Soarer. available in 3 variety.
the UZZ30, UZZ31 & UZZ32. uses the 1UZ-FE.
2)the NA inline6 3litre aka SC300 Soarer. the JZZ31. uses the 2JZ-GE.
3)the twin turbo inline6 2.5litre Soarer that was never badged as a Lexus. the JZZ30. uses the 1JZ-GTE.
equipment varies with each version, with the v8 with the works and the 2.5TT as a barebone.
however there are 'limited' versions of the 2.5TT known as the GT-TL which still has electric lumbar, wood trim, etc.
hope that satisfies some curiosity... juz my 2c.
|
Ok, Looks like I'll be looking at a JZZ30. I take it they were badged toyota?
They are '92-'95 models?
Also, what is a good list of features to look for? I'm not after one fully loaded, but, what would be a good selection to look for? Like, ABS, LSD, etc, or are those standard?
Thanks.
|
the jzz30 is available frm 1991 through 2000.
the later having the vvti conversion and minor exterior changes.
LSD is oni available on manual(rare) versions of the TT.
ABS and other goodies are available on the GT-TL(limited version).
the price range from 15000 all the way to 50000+ for good condition cars.
|
|
|
| Subject | Poster | Date |
 |
Are Soarers / Sc400s any good?
|
chrishulbert | Thu, 27 March 2003 07:43 |
 |
Re: Are Soarers / Sc400s any good?
|
viagra_cressida | Thu, 27 March 2003 10:57 |
 |
Re: Are Soarers / Sc400s any good?
|
ae82 16v | Fri, 28 March 2003 00:39 |
 |
Re: Are Soarers / Sc400s any good?
|
viagra_cressida | Fri, 28 March 2003 02:52 |
 |
Re: Are Soarers / Sc400s any good?
|
freakysoarer | Sat, 29 March 2003 04:12 |
 |
Re: Are Soarers / Sc400s any good?
|
chrishulbert | Sat, 29 March 2003 06:17 |
 |
Re: Are Soarers / Sc400s any good?
|
Soarin | Sat, 29 March 2003 10:22 |
 |
Re: Are Soarers / Sc400s any good?
|
87seca | Sat, 29 March 2003 13:48 |
 |
Re: Are Soarers / Sc400s any good?
|
viagra_cressida | Sun, 30 March 2003 07:38 |
 |
Re: Are Soarers / Sc400s any good?
|
Classique71 | Sun, 30 March 2003 10:23 |
 |
Re: Are Soarers / Sc400s any good?
|
87seca | Sun, 30 March 2003 15:34 |
 |
Re: Are Soarers / Sc400s any good?
|
chrishulbert | Mon, 31 March 2003 02:51 |
 |
Re: Are Soarers / Sc400s any good?
|
Classique71 | Mon, 31 March 2003 09:23 |
 |
Re: Are Soarers / Sc400s any good?
|
rob_RA40 | Mon, 31 March 2003 03:06 |
 |
Re: Are Soarers / Sc400s any good?
|
freakysoarer | Mon, 31 March 2003 06:29 |
 |
Re: Are Soarers / Sc400s any good?
|
Soarer | Mon, 31 March 2003 13:09 |
 |
Re: Are Soarers / Sc400s any good?
|
Soarin | Mon, 31 March 2003 13:31 |
 |
Re: Are Soarers / Sc400s any good?
|
Soarer | Tue, 01 April 2003 00:05 |
 |
Re: Are Soarers / Sc400s any good?
|
viagra_cressida | Wed, 02 April 2003 05:46 |
 |
Re: Are Soarers / Sc400s any good?
|
freakysoarer | Wed, 02 April 2003 06:10 |
 |
Re: Are Soarers / Sc400s any good?
|
viagra_cressida | Wed, 02 April 2003 06:20 |
 |
Re: Are Soarers / Sc400s any good?
|
freakysoarer | Wed, 02 April 2003 06:28 |
 |
Re: Are Soarers / Sc400s any good?
|
Soarin | Wed, 02 April 2003 07:48 |
 |
Re: Are Soarers / Sc400s any good?
|
Apollo | Wed, 02 April 2003 08:20 |
 |
Re: Are Soarers / Sc400s any good?
|
freakysoarer | Wed, 02 April 2003 09:48 |
 |
Re: Are Soarers / Sc400s any good?
|
Apollo | Wed, 02 April 2003 12:24 |
 |
Re: Are Soarers / Sc400s any good?
|
freakysoarer | Wed, 02 April 2003 12:43 |
 |
Re: Are Soarers / Sc400s any good?
|
viagra_cressida | Wed, 02 April 2003 10:54 |