| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
Brisbane
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: ra60/ma61 struts - camber
|
Wed, 19 June 2002 09:35
 
|
 |
The lower control arm length is only part of the story. The RA6x struts have a different kingpin angle to earlier Celica/Corolla struts, hence the camber problems. I put MA61 struts in my RA23 Celica and wound up with a few degrees of positive camber, and I know it's the same story with a TE72 T18. I expect an AE86 is much the same given the similarity of its chassis to older rollas and Celicas.
To get around this problem you can have the struts bent to compensate or use longer lower control arms. The latter works quite well but the downside is a noticeably wider front track!
|
|
|
| | Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|
 |
ra60/ma61 struts - camber
|
chrisss | Tue, 18 June 2002 00:00 |
|
Re: ra60/ma61 struts - camber
|
justcallmefrank | Tue, 18 June 2002 00:42 |
|
Re: ra60/ma61 struts - camber
|
humble | Tue, 18 June 2002 01:19 |
|
Re: ra60/ma61 struts - camber
|
chrisss | Tue, 18 June 2002 06:27 |
|
Re: ra60/ma61 struts - camber
|
humble | Tue, 18 June 2002 09:40 |
|
Re: ra60/ma61 struts - camber
|
mrshin | Wed, 19 June 2002 08:54 |
|
Re: ra60/ma61 struts - camber
|
Norbie | Wed, 19 June 2002 09:35 |
|
Re: ra60/ma61 struts - camber
|
TE72_Turbo | Wed, 19 June 2002 12:25 |
|
Re: ra60/ma61 struts - camber
|
chrisss | Wed, 19 June 2002 12:29 |
|
Re: ra60/ma61 struts - camber
|
TE72_Turbo | Wed, 19 June 2002 13:00 |
|
Re: ra60/ma61 struts - camber
|
chrisss | Wed, 19 June 2002 13:19 |
|
Re: ra60/ma61 struts - camber
|
Jonny2TG | Thu, 20 June 2002 04:12 |
|
Re: ra60/ma61 struts - camber
|
purpleminiep | Fri, 28 June 2002 14:50 |
|
Re: ra60/ma61 struts - camber
|
daytona | Sun, 30 June 2002 20:05 |
