| Author | Topic |
|---|
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
CSX Vs CS Vs SX secas
|
Tue, 16 September 2003 02:58
|
 |
1985 - 89 AE82 secas i am sure only came csi and csx
1990 + seca (what code are these?) there were sx twin cams along with csi and csx right
can someone tell me the differences between all them ?
in terms of gear the car came with i,e, disc brakes, a/c power mirrors/windoes etc...
thanks
|
|
|
Location:
Cabramatta, NSW
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: CSX Vs CS Vs SX secas
|
Tue, 16 September 2003 03:20
|
|
From what I remember of Rollas of that time:
CS: Base type with black bumpers and the bugger all features
CSi: CS with EFI and a few other goodies (like air I think)
CSX: Body coloured bumpers, mags, etc...
SX is AE92 and AE93 only. Basically a CSX with the 100kW 4A-GE.
The AE82 with the 4A-GE (86kW one) was just called the Twin Cam... I think...
|
|
|
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: CSX Vs CS Vs SX secas
|
Tue, 16 September 2003 04:09
|
|
damm dictionary u are
ae92 (round)
ae93 (aeroback) ???
|
|
|
Location:
Cabramatta, NSW
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: CSX Vs CS Vs SX secas
|
Tue, 16 September 2003 04:17
|
|
AE92 = Corolla
AE93 = Seca
|
|
|
Location:
Camden
Registered:
July 2002
|
|
Re: CSX Vs CS Vs SX secas
|
Tue, 16 September 2003 09:58
|
|
|
AE93 came in hatch also....
|
|
|
I supported Toymods
Location:
Epping, Sydney
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: CSX Vs CS Vs SX secas
|
Tue, 16 September 2003 09:59
|
|
bloody hell max, get a life 
|
|
|
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: CSX Vs CS Vs SX secas
|
Tue, 16 September 2003 23:14
|
|
SHHHH gregs... I need his brains... 
|
|
|
Location:
Cabramatta, NSW
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: CSX Vs CS Vs SX secas
|
Wed, 17 September 2003 00:06
|
|
Yes, sadly, I was once in the Corolla camp. Although I can justify it because back then I knew nothing about cars and didn't actually enjoy driving.
It took the ownership of a real car before I could appreciate the joy in drving.
Actually, when I bought my car, I was actually looking for an AE82. I was just in Auburn and saw a cheap Celica in the Trading Post in Auburn. I was there, so I thought it couldn't hurt to look.
I was blown away by the condition of the car and bought it straight away.
Oh how different things might've been if I'd never bothered...
|
|
|
Location:
Launceston, Tasmania
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: CSX Vs CS Vs SX secas
|
Wed, 17 September 2003 01:01
|
|
|
ae93 is the code that the sx was given, be it a hatch or a seca. ae92 is pretty much every other hatch, seca or sedan. There was also an ae94, i think it was the seca RV but i'm not sure & there was also the ae95 that was the 4wd wagon.
|
|
|
Location:
Brisbane
Registered:
May 2003
|
|
|
Toymods Social Secretary
Location:
Sydney
Registered:
July 2002
|
|
Re: CSX Vs CS Vs SX secas
|
Wed, 17 September 2003 12:32
|
|
as for trim levels/features....
# SX, GTi, and RV were the only ones to come with 4 wheel disc brakes.
# RV has the 7a-fe (1.8L)
# Aircon wasn't standard on any model AFAIK. But MANY dealers gave it as a "dealer standard"
# Power windows appeared on some SX and GTi models.
# SX has the best trim, along with CS-X. These have the moulded fibreglass doortrims. the GTi had a lover grade interior trim than the SX.
# GTi was ONLY hatch.
# SX and GTi were only ones with 4a-ge.
# SX and GTi have the full spec dash with oil, volts, tacho meters.
# CSi limited and CS-X have tacho dash i think.
# CS is bogdet.
Thats about all i know... i think. 
Hope that helps dude.
|
|
|
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: CSX Vs CS Vs SX secas
|
Thu, 18 September 2003 03:26
|
|
thanks guys esp. witzl !
i want a bodget one lol
|
|
|
Location:
Launceston, Tasmania
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: CSX Vs CS Vs SX secas
|
Thu, 18 September 2003 03:33
|
|
& i want the lover grade interior from a GTI 
the ae93 is every SX model, be it a series one or two, hatch or seca. The GTI is also an ae93.
|
|
|
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: CSX Vs CS Vs SX secas
|
Thu, 18 September 2003 12:58
|
|
lover grade heahehaehahe 
Performance wise - how do the ae93 SXs and the GTIs compare with say the 3sge from the 86 SX celica ?
|
|
|
Toymods Social Secretary
Location:
Sydney
Registered:
July 2002
|
|
Re: CSX Vs CS Vs SX secas
|
Thu, 18 September 2003 13:04
|
|
comparing the two cars - probably not much in it, but i would think the ST162 would juuuust pull away from the AE92.
That said i would still stick with the AE92, much cheaper and easier conversion options available!
|
|
|
Location:
Adelaide
Registered:
April 2003
|
|
Re: CSX Vs CS Vs SX secas
|
Thu, 18 September 2003 13:35
|
|
| THE WITZL wrote on Wed, 17 September 2003 22:02 |
as for trim levels/features....
# SX, GTi, and RV were the only ones to come with 4 wheel disc brakes.
|
How about the holden nova ae92's??? Which ones had disk brakes at the back?
|
|
|
Location:
Launceston, Tasmania
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: CSX Vs CS Vs SX secas
|
Thu, 18 September 2003 23:15
|
|
|
From memory the ae93 sx has a better 0 - 100 time by .4 of a second. I have raced a friend who has a st162 and it is quite even, i usually win by a nose up to 60kmph anyway.
|
|
|
Location:
Adelaide and Queenstown T...
Registered:
September 2002
|
|
Re: CSX Vs CS Vs SX secas
|
Fri, 19 September 2003 04:12
|
|
|
My wife's seca is an AE94 according to it's VIN.
|
|
|
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: CSX Vs CS Vs SX secas
|
Sun, 21 September 2003 03:59
|
|
|
sx celicas look better tho...
|
|
|
Location:
Launceston, Tasmania
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: CSX Vs CS Vs SX secas
|
Sun, 21 September 2003 08:11
|
|
|
Is some peoples opinion they do look better. Personally i would rather the look of the corolla sx, that's why i got one
|
|
|
Location:
Adelaide
Registered:
April 2003
|
|
Re: CSX Vs CS Vs SX secas
|
Wed, 05 November 2003 12:11
|
|
hm... how about externally?
how does a csi model differ from an sx or gti?
(more specifically the hatchback)
|
|
|
Location:
Turramurra, Sydney
Registered:
October 2003
|
|
Re: CSX Vs CS Vs SX secas
|
Wed, 05 November 2003 12:31
|
|
gti/sx has disc brakes all round.
Front bars different.
Engine oviously.
Oh and the rear wing
Brendon
|
|
|
Location:
Turramurra, Sydney
Registered:
October 2003
|
|
|
I supported Toymods
Location:
Sutho/Hills NSW
Registered:
September 2002
|
|
Re: CSX Vs CS Vs SX secas
|
Thu, 06 November 2003 01:01
|
|
You can but for all the effort its worth just buy a SX/GTi or even an RV.
Mines pretty much has all the sx options bar the rear wing.
Dash
Door trims
Seats
Front bar
Rear discs
yada yada
but from experience your best off buying the SX.
|
|
|
Location:
Adelaide
Registered:
April 2003
|
|
Re: CSX Vs CS Vs SX secas
|
Thu, 06 November 2003 06:09
|
|
Is the rear wing on an sx or gti hatch usually black?
or does it correspond to the colour of the body??
|
|
|
I supported Toymods
Location:
Sydney
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: CSX Vs CS Vs SX secas
|
Thu, 06 November 2003 11:02
|
|
All SX hatches came with black rear wings.
All GTi wings are colour coded.
SX and CS-X came with power mirrors and possibly alloys as standard
|
|
|
I supported Toymods
Location:
Sutho/Hills NSW
Registered:
September 2002
|
|
Re: CSX Vs CS Vs SX secas
|
Fri, 07 November 2003 08:04
|
|
it just varies i think.
most 89 models have them black, 90+ they are colour coded.
|
|
|
Location:
Turramurra, Sydney
Registered:
October 2003
|
|
Re: CSX Vs CS Vs SX secas
|
Fri, 07 November 2003 15:07
|
|
Guys what about the SE rolla's?
Are they base base models??
|
|
|
Registered:
October 2003
|
|
Re: CSX Vs CS Vs SX secas
|
Fri, 07 November 2003 22:23
|
|
is it possible to find a SX/GTi Rolla in stock automatic?
|
|
|
Location:
Turramurra, Sydney
Registered:
October 2003
|
|
Re: CSX Vs CS Vs SX secas
|
Sat, 08 November 2003 01:00
|
|
of course it is.
Just doesn't pop up regularly, and if it does, if your not quick, its gone!
Just be patient and keep looking.
|
|
|
I supported Toymods
Location:
Sutho/Hills NSW
Registered:
September 2002
|
|
Re: CSX Vs CS Vs SX secas
|
Sun, 09 November 2003 08:43
|
|
|
yes, best interior to do some custom vynal spray work on though
|
|
|
