Author | Topic |
Location: Melbourne
Registered: March 2004
|
|
|
Location: Melbourne
Registered: March 2004
|
Re: ST162 vs. Tree
|
Sun, 18 April 2004 07:35
|
|
BTW: I wasn't speeding or doing anything dumb at the time - it was just a bad combination of inexperience and dodgy road~ We probly hit the tree at about 30km/h.
|
|
|
Location: Brisbane, QLD, Australia
Registered: May 2002
|
Re: ST162 vs. Tree
|
Sun, 18 April 2004 07:40
|
|
And all the while the driver of the cruiser would have watched the whole thing in his rear view as he blissfully kept puttering along on his way too I'd wager.
You also need to stir up the good for nothing council to fix that road too by the sounds of it. One car a month is shocking.
|
|
|
Registered: May 2002
|
Re: ST162 vs. Tree
|
Sun, 18 April 2004 08:23
|
|
my bingle had that much damage on it ... i was going much quicker than 30km/h though !!!
it is fixable ... is u are willing to have it off the road
comprehensive insurance ?
|
|
|
Location: Campbelltown, NSW, Austra...
Registered: January 2004
|
Re: ST162 vs. Tree
|
Sun, 18 April 2004 08:57
|
|
You had better hope that the chasis isn't bent, it happened to my parent's forrester, would have cost about 3000 without insurance, and that was by reversing into something at low speed.
|
|
|
Location: Melbourne
Registered: March 2004
|
Re: ST162 vs. Tree
|
Sun, 18 April 2004 10:12
|
|
I only got 3rd party on it, but if i can get it repaired for under $3500 it'll still work out cheaper than having comprehensive.
If it cant be fixed then i might get a Camry and transplant the mechanicals, it'd be a shame though - the car was in pristine condition~
|
|
|
Location: Ballarat, Victoria
Registered: March 2003
|
Re: ST162 vs. Tree
|
Sun, 18 April 2004 12:07
|
|
that sucks man, hope you can get your baby all fixed up
|
|
|
Location: Epping, Sydney
Registered: April 2003
|
Re: ST162 vs. Tree
|
Mon, 19 April 2004 03:53
|
|
dude I am sorry to see that! It sux bad ay..
I hate to see a 162 all messed up Hope it all works out for you man I really do.
Rob
|
|
|
Location: Melbourne
Registered: March 2004
|
|
|
Location: Melbourne
Registered: October 2003
|
Re: ST162 vs. Tree
|
Mon, 19 April 2004 14:01
|
|
Hey,
Saw this today, really sad stuff, the chassis still seems ok, but yeah smashed_wombat showed me the corner tonight, its one of the worsed corners around..
I went through it pretty damn slow in the corolla CS, and it still felt pretty rough, the road is corrogated, and it would be a death trap in the wet...
Glad ur ok from it though, it could have been a lot worse...
My recommendation would be to get a doner shell and swap everything over, u've got a perfect interior, and engine...
For the money of repairing u could get another st-162 for that...
Just my 2 cents..
nice to meet ya by the way Andrew!
|
|
|
Location: Sydney
Registered: June 2003
|
Re: ST162 vs. Tree
|
Tue, 20 April 2004 06:22
|
|
Les wrote on Sun, 18 April 2004 18:23 | my bingle had that much damage on it ... i was going much quicker than 30km/h though !!!
it is fixable ... is u are willing to have it off the road
comprehensive insurance ?
|
It varies a lot. I wrote off a car going about 20-30 and it totally looked like it was going twice as fast. If it just hits right or something it can do that.
|
|
|
Location: Melbourne
Registered: October 2002
|
Re: ST162 vs. Tree
|
Sat, 24 April 2004 00:34
|
|
tree-1 162-0
haha.
read about it on celica.net man. sad to see. for those prices though is it really worth fixing it?? can't you buy another one for around the same cost? id be doing that and save the risk of a bent chassis, that kinked rail doesnt look good.
glad you walked out alive and no one was hurt.
|
|
|
Location: Melbourne
Registered: March 2004
|
Re: ST162 vs. Tree
|
Sat, 24 April 2004 09:10
|
|
Yeah - the more I think about it, the more ways i can see it being horribly worse!
I went and got a few of my own quotes yesterday and its looking a little better! I offered to find the parts (by buying a side-cut w/ the chassis sill, door and A-pillar), sand + prime the panels and strip the interior myself and that price came down to a more reasonable $1500.
Another panel-beater said he'd do the job for around the same price but he'd fix the quarter panel instead of replacing it and try to pull out the sill and A-pillar first. Hopefully its gonna work out.
I'll probably keep it another year then sell it to some hoon~ Such a shame tho - the car was perfect before this happened. I suppose I'm gonna learn some basic panel-beating out of it, so it's not all bad!
|
|
|
Location: Yagoona Sydney
Registered: December 2003
|
Re: ST162 vs. Tree
|
Sat, 24 April 2004 09:12
|
|
if only you lived in syd. I know heaps of beaters that would of fixed that for around $1500.
So sorry about the car it looks clean, and thankgod your ok!
|
|
|
Location: Sydney
Registered: May 2003
|
Re: ST162 vs. Tree
|
Sat, 24 April 2004 11:28
|
|
damn man, sorry to hear that, hope it all gets fixed up and doesnt work out too expensive
|
|
|
Location: Melbourne
Registered: March 2004
|
|
|
Location: Adelaide
Registered: January 2004
|
Re: ST162 vs. Tree - !!! ITS FIXED !!!
|
Thu, 20 May 2004 22:43
|
|
so how much was it for the repairs in the end?
|
|
|
Location: melbourne
Registered: February 2004
|
Re: ST162 vs. Tree - !!! ITS FIXED !!!
|
Sat, 22 May 2004 04:41
|
|
saw this the other night when you guys came over, looks bloody great, i'd never have known it was ever in a bingle if you hadn't mentioned it yourself!
|
|
|
Location: Melbourne
Registered: June 2003
|
Re: ST162 vs. Tree - !!! ITS FIXED !!!
|
Sat, 19 June 2004 01:09
|
|
Nice!
we can go on a cruise now!!!!!
|
|
|