| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
Sydney
Registered:
June 2003
|
|
MkIII vs R33 gts
|
Wed, 21 April 2004 07:17
|
 |
Well The other night I finally got to race my first skyline. 
We were at the intersection of the M2 and Pennant Hills Rd. A nice bit of 3 lane straight rd with not another car in sight (it was about 12am). I pulled up beside him and just waited. We both took off slow and then sorta glanced at each other and floored it at the same time. By the end of first gear I was about level with the back of his front wheels (stupid 4wd ). By the end of second he was about level with the back of my front tyres. We stopped then as I was slowly pulling away and we were already going 100 or so on a 70 rd.
Wheeeee 
|
|
|
Location:
Sydney
Registered:
April 2003
|
|
Re: MkIII vs R33 gts
|
Wed, 21 April 2004 07:18
|
|
|
Nice one.
|
|
|
Location:
Melbourne
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: MkIII vs R33 gts
|
Wed, 21 April 2004 13:35
|
|
Dry weather most Skylines are roadkill for MkIII's stall up the auto get some boost up and thay dont have a chance AWD or not
Allan
|
|
|
Location:
Sydney
Registered:
June 2003
|
|
Re: MkIII vs R33 gts
|
Thu, 22 April 2004 01:49
|
|
|
Heh heh. Really? even the r34's????
|
|
|
I supported Toymods
Location:
Perth
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: MkIII vs R33 gts
|
Thu, 22 April 2004 02:15
|
|
|
GTS Skylines aren't 4WD. Nice on the run anyway
|
|
|
Location:
Sydney
Registered:
June 2003
|
|
Re: MkIII vs R33 gts
|
Thu, 22 April 2004 02:45
|
|
|
Oh. Rats. Oh well.
|
|
|
Location:
sunny coast, qld
Registered:
October 2002
|
|
Re: MkIII vs R33 gts
|
Thu, 22 April 2004 11:12
|
|
r34's are supposably the same speed as r33's as they make a bit more power but are heavier.
r32 gts's are slow!
|
|
|
I supported Toymods
Location:
sydney.au
Registered:
August 2002
|
|
Re: MkIII vs R33 gts
|
Thu, 22 April 2004 13:28
|
|
r32 gtrs are scary
having recently driven one...hehehehe
|
|
|
Location:
Sydney
Registered:
June 2003
|
|
Re: MkIII vs R33 gts
|
Fri, 23 April 2004 00:23
|
|
|
Same speed??? Surely not. If that is the case, I am less than impressed. Plus the 4wd would be a HUGE advantage.
|
|
|
I supported Toymods
Location:
Perth
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: MkIII vs R33 gts
|
Fri, 23 April 2004 00:29
|
|
|
Dude, there isn't any 4WD turbo ones from the R33 onwards remember!?
|
|
|
Location:
Sydney
Registered:
June 2003
|
|
Re: MkIII vs R33 gts
|
Fri, 23 April 2004 00:34
|
|
Ok, so now I am so lost its not funny. 
I thought that the new r34 gtr was a 4wd as was the r33 gtr??
|
|
|
I supported Toymods
Location:
Perth
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: MkIII vs R33 gts
|
Fri, 23 April 2004 00:36
|
|
|
Yeah, but you guys were still talking about the GTS model's were you not?
|
|
|
Location:
Sydney
Registered:
June 2003
|
|
Re: MkIII vs R33 gts
|
Fri, 23 April 2004 00:43
|
|
I was talking in referance to this statement:
| Quote: |
r34's are supposably the same speed as r33's as they make a bit more power but are heavier.
|
I bit of misunderstanding there.
|
|
|
Location:
melbourne
Registered:
October 2003
|
|
Re: MkIII vs R33 gts
|
Fri, 23 April 2004 02:53
|
|
|
what about the gts 4? i thought that was 4wd?
|
|
|
I supported Toymods
Location:
Perth
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: MkIII vs R33 gts
|
Fri, 23 April 2004 03:02
|
|
|
It is, but Nissan stopped making turbo 4WD versions with the R33 so as to not take any of the limelight from the GTR.
|
|
|
Location:
Brisbane
Registered:
July 2002
|
|
Re: MkIII vs R33 gts
|
Sat, 24 April 2004 12:35
|
|
nice run ... that makes me happy as is a good indication for when i get my car back..
|
|
|
