| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
www.geocities.com/drextacy
Registered:
August 2003
|
|
owned
|
Thu, 01 January 2004 08:02
|
 |
Hey wher did the owned thread get to? oh wel heres one
|
|
|
Location:
Bayside Melbourne.
Registered:
May 2003
|
|
Re: owned
|
Thu, 01 January 2004 08:16
|
|
OMG!!!! One of you posted pictures actually works! 
|
|
|
Location:
Sydney
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: owned
|
Thu, 01 January 2004 08:16
|
|
| SIMDOG wrote on Thu, 01 January 2004 19:16 |
OMG!!!! One of you posted pictures actually works!
|
LOL
|
|
|
Location:
Sydney
Registered:
June 2003
|
|
Re: owned
|
Thu, 01 January 2004 10:53
|
|
|
looks like a dolphin more then a shark.
|
|
|
I supported Toymods
Banned User
Location:
Brisbane
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: owned
|
Thu, 01 January 2004 10:57
|
|
|
Its a shark.
|
|
|
I supported Toymods
Location:
I renounced punctuation
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: owned
|
Thu, 01 January 2004 10:59
|
|
| Grinder wrote on Thu, 01 January 2004 21:53 |
looks like a dolphin more then a shark.
|
Exactly what I was about to post. Look at the shape of the dorsal fin. Shark fins are generally much more angular. This one is quite curved.
|
|
|
Location:
Newcastle
Registered:
April 2003
|
|
Re: owned
|
Thu, 01 January 2004 11:05
|
|
I don't think you would want to hang around to find out.
"Oh look i wonder if it's a dolphin or sh chomp"
|
|
|
Location:
Sydney
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: owned
|
Thu, 01 January 2004 11:16
|
|
i think its a dolphin....look at the tail
it seems to be horizontal
sharks dont come out with horizontal tails from factory do they ?
i wonder if he got an EPA check for that
|
|
|
Location:
Canberra
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: owned
|
Thu, 01 January 2004 11:17
|
|
Saw this in a Ralf mag once...
That sholphin looks huge
|
|
|
Location:
1st street on the right
Registered:
November 2002
|
|
Re: owned
|
Thu, 01 January 2004 11:57
|
|
|
Take it from someone who's seen tigers and hammerheads close up. It's a shark (though neither of those). Mind you if it's a dolphin, I still wouldn't want to get too close either. Trainers get damaged by much smaller ones in their pools. Imaging what one this size could do "playing".
|
|
|
Location:
Sydney
Registered:
June 2003
|
|
Re: owned
|
Thu, 01 January 2004 12:26
|
|
I speak from no experience with sharks and dolphins except for national geographic channel. The dorsal fin looks to pointed, the tail looks horizontal, though its hard to tell, could also be smudged in the picture to make it look more like a shark and the nose looks like it comes to too much of a long point as apposed to the short point of a shark.
Though do dolphins normally grow that big?
|
|
|
Location:
Canberra
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: owned
|
Thu, 01 January 2004 13:52
|
|
|
SHOLPHIN!
|
|
|
Location:
Sydney
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: owned
|
Thu, 01 January 2004 13:54
|
|
| Old School wrote on Fri, 02 January 2004 00:52 |
SHOLPHIN!
|
thats not funny but im cacking my ass off here cause my heads just gone today
|
|
|
Location:
Melbourne
Registered:
November 2003
|
|
Re: owned
|
Thu, 01 January 2004 15:04
|
|
Yeah, the dorsal fin looks like a sharks, but the underwater part looks more like a dolphin, although it's kinda hard to tell.
Personaly I could easily modify the fin of a Dolphin to look like a sharks fin like this. I'm not saying that this has been modified though, I can't tell 'cuz the quality isn't so good.
|
|
|
Location:
Bayside Melbourne.
Registered:
May 2003
|
|
Re: owned
|
Fri, 02 January 2004 00:12
|
|
Sraka... Modify it to the point of complete certainty one way or another so this little argument can die. 
|
|
|
Location:
Colac, Victoria
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
|
Location:
www.geocities.com/drextacy
Registered:
August 2003
|
|
Re: owned
|
Fri, 02 January 2004 03:14
|
|
| Quote: |
Sraka... Modify it to the point of complete certainty one way or another so this little argument can die
|
well first of all its shraka, but, il take it on myself to fulfil this lil request
|
|
|
Location:
Blacktown, Sydney
Registered:
December 2003
|
|
Re: owned
|
Fri, 02 January 2004 03:16
|
|
id say itz a shaphina ??
hehehe
shark nose (tiger shark)
dolphin dorsal fin
tuna tail hahaha
lolz it kinda lookz photoshopped though but still if that was real id BOLT !! even if i was on water hahaha ...
|
|
|
Location:
Melbourne
Registered:
November 2003
|
|
Re: owned
|
Fri, 02 January 2004 03:44
|
|
Well here is the "shark" as a Dolphin...
That took me about two minutes to do.
This one took a little longer...
And this one was probably the quickest to do...
So there you have it.
|
|
|
Location:
www.geocities.com/drextacy
Registered:
August 2003
|
|
Re: owned
|
Fri, 02 January 2004 04:48
|
|
hmm, nice attempt there Shraka, BUT i stil prefer my own, more clearer renditions
THUS:
Dolphin as Shark
Shark as shark, this pic courtesy of McFeeblebees' pond, in which a boy decides to fish in pre mentioneds named pond as he count not hear others opinions, due to a peice of mollasses being located in his yeah, i encourage all of you to embark on this wonderful journey at
http://www.magickeys.com/books/mcfee/mpp1.html
|
|
|
Location:
Canberra
Registered:
August 2002
|
|
Re: owned
|
Fri, 02 January 2004 12:13
|
|
wat ever it is/was...
its freakin huge!!!
and man i would want to be wearing my brown wetsuit that day! 
|
|
|
Location:
Melbourne
Registered:
October 2003
|
|
Re: owned
|
Fri, 02 January 2004 13:13
|
|
As Stu said. A Dolphins 'tail' is level with the horizon ! A sharks tail is Vertical ! Case solved.
ps. someone show me a dolphin with a nose that fricken pointy. Sharks have sensitive noses and under bellies, the former due to the pointy nature. with such a point any force means great pressure which tends to hurt. Dolphins however have strong noses which they use to stab and kill kill kill the fricken sharks !.
Thats all for todays lesson children. Tune in next week for another episode of "OWN3D"
|
|
|
Location:
Melbourne
Registered:
November 2003
|
|
Re: owned
|
Fri, 02 January 2004 13:17
|
|
Sorry T APLUS, that solves nothing. That tail could be vertical or horizontal. Due to distortion in the water and shadows etc, its impossible to tell for sure.
However, the nose does look kinda shark like.
|
|
|
Location:
brisbane
Registered:
August 2003
|
|
Re: owned
|
Fri, 02 January 2004 14:09
|
|
I click on an owned thread execting more.
I wasted all that time scrolling down to find nothing but disappointment.
|
|
|
Location:
Melbourne
Registered:
November 2003
|
|
Re: owned
|
Fri, 02 January 2004 14:36
|
|
|
Well sorry we couldn't be more entertaining for you your majesty.
|
|
|
Location:
brisbane
Registered:
August 2003
|
|
Re: owned
|
Fri, 02 January 2004 14:44
|
|
Quiet jester and get me another flaggon of ale!
And some Owned pictures.
|
|
|
I supported Toymods
Banned User
Location:
Brisbane
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: owned
|
Fri, 02 January 2004 22:02
|
|
Your all wrong  Sharks tails and dorsals completely change shape depending on how salty the water is and also the temperature of the water.
Any shark expert will tell you that the tail and dorsal cannot be used to tell shark from a floating turd.
And its a shark! Look how long and sharp the head is.
|
|
|
I supported Toymods
Location:
I renounced punctuation
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: owned
|
Sat, 03 January 2004 00:12
|
|
The only people who are "OWN3D" are those folk that said it was a shark.
Here is a website created by the person (Kurt Jones) who took the photo. He has some extra shots which clearly demonstrate it is a small cetacean.
Some one say "Flipper"?
|
|
|
Location:
Canberra
Registered:
August 2002
|
|
Re: owned
|
Sat, 03 January 2004 01:32
|
|
|
well some people just like to take all the fun outta life.
|
|
|
Location:
Melbourne
Registered:
November 2003
|
|
Re: owned
|
Sat, 03 January 2004 04:12
|
|
|
Yes well by that second shot it's definatly a dolphin.
|
|
|
Location:
Adelaide
Registered:
June 2003
|
|
Re: owned
|
Sat, 03 January 2004 04:37
|
|
| Cool1 wrote on Sat, 03 January 2004 09:02 |
Your all wrong Sharks tails and dorsals completely change shape depending on how salty the water is and also the temperature of the water.
Any shark expert will tell you that the tail and dorsal cannot be used to tell shark from a floating turd.
And its a shark! Look how long and sharp the head is.
|
no it only looks like that because the dolphin is swimming on an angle
|
|
|
Location:
Cranebrook, Sydney
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: owned
|
Sun, 04 January 2004 11:09
|
|
most definately a SHARK! how do i know.....cause im the guy in the pic (lol)....... no seriously its to long to be flipper......and you'll find that sharks tails come vertical from factory were as dolphins are horizontal.....here endith the lesson 
|
|
|
Location:
Melbourne
Registered:
November 2003
|
|
|
Location:
Melbourne
Registered:
October 2003
|
|
Re: owned
|
Sun, 04 January 2004 12:02
|
|
| T APLUS 22 wrote on Sat, 03 January 2004 00:13 |
As Stu said. A Dolphins 'tail' is level with the horizon ! A sharks tail is Vertical ! Case solved.
ps. someone show me a dolphin with a nose that fricken pointy. Sharks have sensitive noses and under bellies, the former due to the pointy nature. with such a point any force means great pressure which tends to hurt. Dolphins however have strong noses which they use to stab and kill kill kill the fricken sharks !.
Thats all for todays lesson children. Tune in next week for another episode of "OWN3D"
|
Ok My bad. the tail is distorted and could be flat.
|
|
|
Location:
Sydney
Registered:
June 2003
|
|
Re: owned
|
Sun, 04 January 2004 13:08
|
|
|
'could be'?... Is cant believe someone actually has a site on it.
|
|
|
Location:
Melbourne
Registered:
November 2003
|
|
Re: owned
|
Sun, 04 January 2004 13:27
|
|
|
I think it's teh guy who took the photo...
|
|
|
Location:
Melbourne
Registered:
October 2003
|
|
Re: owned
|
Sun, 04 January 2004 15:35
|
|
| Grinder wrote on Mon, 05 January 2004 00:08 |
'could be'?... Is cant believe someone actually has a site on it.
|
was just stating the error in judgement.
|
|
|
Location:
Canberra
Registered:
August 2003
|
|
|
Location:
central coast, NSW
Registered:
April 2004
|
|
Re: owned
|
Fri, 23 April 2004 07:34
|
|
[quote title=Squid wrote on Fri, 23 April 2004 16:04]Sorry to bring this back from the dead, but it is a dolphin!
dolphin was clever to look like a shark ( aha )
like to know how u bought it back from the dead...
good r & r
|
|
|
Location:
UK at moment
Registered:
May 2003
|
|
Re: owned
|
Fri, 23 April 2004 08:15
|
|
|
that is one MASSIVE dolfin!
|
|
|
Location:
toowoomba qld
Registered:
March 2004
|
|
Re: owned
|
Fri, 23 April 2004 08:42
|
|
|
DOLPHIN
|
|
|
Location:
UK at moment
Registered:
May 2003
|
|
Re: owned
|
Fri, 23 April 2004 09:05
|
|
|
OKOK
|
|
|
Location:
Behind you
Registered:
May 2003
|
|
Re: owned
|
Fri, 23 April 2004 09:48
|
|
| mick wrote on Fri, 23 April 2004 18:42 |
DOLPHIN
|
No mick. Turtle.
|
|
|
Location:
adelaide
Registered:
April 2003
|
|
Re: owned
|
Fri, 23 April 2004 14:35
|
|
| Shraka wrote on Fri, 02 January 2004 14:44 |
This one took a little longer...
|
attacked by a turd?
|
|
|
Location:
toowoomba qld
Registered:
March 2004
|
|
Re: owned
|
Sat, 24 April 2004 05:27
|
|
| Backspace wrote on Fri, 23 April 2004 19:48 |
| mick wrote on Fri, 23 April 2004 18:42 |
DOLPHIN
|
No mick. Turtle.
|
|
|
|
