| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
Perth
Registered:
May 2003
|
|
Re: Nissan Exa vs mk3 toyota supra
|
Thu, 12 February 2004 04:36
 
|
 |
it is a crown
heres a pic of a late model mark2
heres a pic of a blin bling corona
|
|
|
Registered:
August 2003
|
|
Re: Nissan Exa vs mk3 toyota supra
|
Thu, 12 February 2004 08:40
|
|
| ta23 wrote on Thu, 12 February 2004 00:08 |
| coronamark2 wrote on Wed, 11 February 2004 20:20 |
only "little" men can fit in exas
big men fit but complain about the sheer crappyines that is EXA
|
I am over 6 foot and not small, I can fit in an exa with no worries, my brother is even bigger than me and he owned an exa, neither of us complained about the sheer crappyness as it was one of the best cars I have ever driven, got an unbelievable amount of POSITIVE comments from non homo's and smoked any car that it came up against.
I believe most toyotas are better than most exas, but you all must give the exa some credit (not in standard form) but when it is done up right, it looks mean and goes hard.
If only my brother still had the car I would be able show you how fast and how good it actually was, as I said before it would beat most of you guys in a quartermile race and here you are all saying how gay they are, mustn't be too gay if they can get many positive comments and could beat most of YOU guys posting here.
I am not an Exa enthusiast or anything, just stressing that exa's arent the worst car in the world as you guys are making them sound.
|
you sound like a smart person after all.
maybe we can be friends 
You're exactly right, exa's can beat most of the people posting here. My exa is almost as stock as they come with some engine problems, and I still have no problem beating all the corolla boys out there.
stick a CA18DET in and you've got a car that will easily stand its ground against a much wider range of turbo or modified vehicles.
Would you give the same crap to a silvia with a ca18 in it? (yeah its RWD, so what).
Doubt it
I think this is just an exa conspiracy.
|
|
|
Location:
Sydney/Wollongong
Registered:
October 2003
|
|
|
Registered:
August 2003
|
|
Re: Nissan Exa vs mk3 toyota supra
|
Thu, 12 February 2004 08:57
|
|
| Conquest wrote on Thu, 12 February 2004 19:49 |
Just curious ... What sort of engine does the N13 have as stock?
|
name of engine or specs?
CA18DE
1.8L, EFI, twin cam. 93kw in stock form...
|
|
|
Location:
Perth
Registered:
May 2003
|
|
Re: Nissan Exa vs mk3 toyota supra
|
Thu, 12 February 2004 08:57
|
|
| pink_fluffy_boy_lover wrote on Thu, 12 February 2004 16:40 |
would u give the same crap to a silvia with a ca18 in it? (yeah its RWD, so what).
Doubt it
I think this is just an exa conspiracy.
|
no because they have some style and yeah im buyest to the RWD
at the end of the day each to there own dude you like exas fare enough
lets not get argumentative again
|
|
|
Location:
Perth
Registered:
May 2003
|
|
Re: Nissan Exa vs mk3 toyota supra
|
Thu, 12 February 2004 08:59
|
|
| pink_fluffy_boy_lover wrote on Thu, 12 February 2004 16:57 |
| Conquest wrote on Thu, 12 February 2004 19:49 |
Just curious ... What sort of engine does the N13 have as stock?
|
name of engine or specs?
CA18DE
1.8L, EFI, twin cam. 93kw in stock form...
|
93kw at the engine 
it would probably put out 70 on a dyno
|
|
|
Location:
Epping, Sydney
Registered:
April 2003
|
|
Re: Nissan Exa vs mk3 toyota supra
|
Thu, 12 February 2004 09:29
|
|
93kw.... pffffff
I laugh at 93kw
|
|
|
Location:
Brisbane
Registered:
June 2003
|
|
Re: Nissan Exa vs mk3 toyota supra
|
Thu, 12 February 2004 09:38
|
|
| pink_fluffy_boy_lover wrote on Thu, 12 February 2004 18:40 |
| ta23 wrote on Thu, 12 February 2004 00:08 |
| coronamark2 wrote on Wed, 11 February 2004 20:20 |
only "little" men can fit in exas
big men fit but complain about the sheer crappyines that is EXA
|
I am over 6 foot and not small, I can fit in an exa with no worries, my brother is even bigger than me and he owned an exa, neither of us complained about the sheer crappyness as it was one of the best cars I have ever driven, got an unbelievable amount of POSITIVE comments from non homo's and smoked any car that it came up against.
I believe most toyotas are better than most exas, but you all must give the exa some credit (not in standard form) but when it is done up right, it looks mean and goes hard.
If only my brother still had the car I would be able show you how fast and how good it actually was, as I said before it would beat most of you guys in a quartermile race and here you are all saying how gay they are, mustn't be too gay if they can get many positive comments and could beat most of YOU guys posting here.
I am not an Exa enthusiast or anything, just stressing that exa's arent the worst car in the world as you guys are making them sound.
|
you sound like a smart person after all.
maybe we can be friends
You're exactly right, exa's can beat most of the people posting here. My exa is almost as stock as they come with some engine problems, and I still have no problem beating all the corolla boys out there.
stick a CA18DET in and you've got a car that will easily stand its ground against a much wider range of turbo or modified vehicles.
Would you give the same crap to a silvia with a ca18 in it? (yeah its RWD, so what).
Doubt it
I think this is just an exa conspiracy.
|
yeah silvias are just as bad if not worse...
i also think my 5me put out more than 93kw??
[Updated on: Thu, 12 February 2004 09:38]
|
|
|
Location:
Melbourne
Registered:
November 2003
|
|
Re: Nissan Exa vs mk3 toyota supra
|
Thu, 12 February 2004 09:50
|
|
|
Stocke S13 CA18ETs suck ass. On paper the EXA shits all over them for power. Although... papar and real life are two totaly different things. One is made of wood pulp... the other is not.
|
|
|
Location:
Epping, Sydney
Registered:
April 2003
|
|
Re: Nissan Exa vs mk3 toyota supra
|
Thu, 12 February 2004 10:06
|
|
| Quote: |
One is made of wood pulp... the other is not.
|
very astute observation there Shakra? lol
|
|
|
Location:
Sydney
Registered:
April 2003
|
|
Re: Nissan Exa vs mk3 toyota supra
|
Thu, 12 February 2004 11:25
|
|
Leave Silvia's out of this fight 
|
|
|
Registered:
August 2003
|
|
Re: Nissan Exa vs mk3 toyota supra
|
Thu, 12 February 2004 11:25
|
|
| RobST162 wrote on Thu, 12 February 2004 20:29 |
93kw.... pffffff
I laugh at 93kw
|
I wasnt bragging. just stating facts
just goes to show how you should be crying if you get beaten by a stock one.
My car is probably at around 97kw and like i said i have no trouble against all the "little" cars on this forum.
|
|
|
Location:
Epping, Sydney
Registered:
April 2003
|
|
Re: Nissan Exa vs mk3 toyota supra
|
Thu, 12 February 2004 11:37
|
|
| Quote: |
just goes to show how you should be crying if you get beaten by a stock one.
|
and how pray tell would that happen? hahah
dude they are cheap as sportish cars and that is great for those who want that. Like cordias actually...
|
|
|
Registered:
August 2003
|
|
Re: Nissan Exa vs mk3 toyota supra
|
Thu, 12 February 2004 11:46
|
|
exactly. for their price, exa's perform well.
I dont mind the Celica you have Rob.. aren't they similar price range to exa's?
|
|
|
Location:
Epping, Sydney
Registered:
April 2003
|
|
Re: Nissan Exa vs mk3 toyota supra
|
Thu, 12 February 2004 11:51
|
|
when I was looking for a mate you could get better condition Exas for less than equivalent condition Celicas - k's mods etc.. (like in the trady that is)
But the Celica is a more expensive car really so I guess it all works out. What is an exa these days? 5k for a modded one in the trady? I would hope to sell mine for 6k if I was to sell it..
|
|
|
Location:
Ballarat, Victoria
Registered:
March 2003
|
|
Re: Nissan Exa vs mk3 toyota supra
|
Thu, 12 February 2004 12:19
|
|
whoever asked, a 5me is 103kw at the fly, roughly 65kw at the wheels. 
|
|
|
Location:
Melbourne
Registered:
November 2003
|
|
Re: Nissan Exa vs mk3 toyota supra
|
Thu, 12 February 2004 12:43
|
|
EXA N13: 1.8ltr CA18DE - 73kw per ton at the wheels, peak power at 5,700rpm
Celica ST162: 2.0 3S-GE - 83kw per ton at the wheels, peak power at 6,050rpm
So on paper, stock the ST162 rocks the EXAs block. Once again though, wood pulp.
|
|
|
Location:
Epping, Sydney
Registered:
April 2003
|
|
Re: Nissan Exa vs mk3 toyota supra
|
Thu, 12 February 2004 12:58
|
|
yeah what is real life made out of anyway?
|
|
|
Location:
NSW
Registered:
October 2003
|
|
|
Location:
NSW
Registered:
October 2003
|
|
Re: Nissan Exa vs mk3 toyota supra
|
Thu, 12 February 2004 13:59
|
|
| Shraka wrote on Thu, 12 February 2004 23:43 |
EXA N13: 1.8ltr CA18DE - 73kw per ton at the wheels, peak power at 5,700rpm
Celica ST162: 2.0 3S-GE - 83kw per ton at the wheels, peak power at 6,050rpm
So on paper, stock the ST162 rocks the EXAs block. Once again though, wood pulp.
|
But what is the weight of the two cars, this may differentiate the performance of actual on road driving.
|
|
|
Location:
NSW
Registered:
October 2003
|
|
Re: Nissan Exa vs mk3 toyota supra
|
Thu, 12 February 2004 14:04
|
|
|
I suppose that talking about a Nissan or a Toyota Forum the majority of the people will be biased, so lets just stick to the quote "each to their own", the looks of a car is a personal preference only.
|
|
|
Location:
Melbourne
Registered:
November 2003
|
|
Re: Nissan Exa vs mk3 toyota supra
|
Thu, 12 February 2004 15:23
|
|
| RobST162 wrote on Thu, 12 February 2004 23:58 |
yeah what is real life made out of anyway?
|
I told you, wood pulp.
Oops, sorry, my figures where off (I was allowing for 180kg of cargo - ie. big driver and passenger). Here are the real stats:
EXA N13
Power: 97kw @ 5,700rpm (162nm)
Power at wheels (roughly): 79kw
Weight: 900kg
Power to weight: 87kw per ton at the wheels (it weighs less than a ton, so the number goes up)
Celica ST162
Power: 121kw @ 6,050rpm (191nm)
Power at wheels (roughly): 98kw
Weight: 1000kg
Power to weight: 98kw per ton at the wheels
Obviously the Celica is superior in stock form on paper.
|
|
|
Location:
Epping, Sydney
Registered:
April 2003
|
|
Re: Nissan Exa vs mk3 toyota supra
|
Thu, 12 February 2004 23:03
|
|
no dude you multiplied by .X instead of dividing..
and the Celica 162 only does 103 stock. You SURE about the Exa figure??
beacuse that makes exa: 107.7 kw/ton and celica 103kw/ton (of course we are not talking about MY celica here
not convinced about Exa figure dude..
|
|
|
Location:
Melbourne
Registered:
November 2003
|
|
Re: Nissan Exa vs mk3 toyota supra
|
Sat, 14 February 2004 02:47
|
|
|
*shrug* Well that's what the CA18 puts out stock. Atleast, from the info I Can find. But from the info I can find, the Celica has 121kw and 191nm.
|
|
|
Location:
Sunshine Coast
Registered:
February 2004
|
|
Re: Nissan Exa vs mk3 toyota supra
|
Mon, 01 March 2004 16:21
|
|
what bout the aw11?
it looks vaguely like an exa... 
i cant believe i said that 
i considered, however briefly, getting an exa... decided that it wasnt really the sort of car i wanted. FWD, the rear end, etc.
|
|
|
Location:
Finland
Registered:
November 2002
|
|
|
Location:
Finland
Registered:
November 2002
|
|
Re: Nissan Exa vs mk3 toyota supra
|
Mon, 01 March 2004 17:24
|
|
This really gushes sex compared to Exa's
These are FWD too! so these must be sport cars too!
|
|
|
Location:
Sunshine Coast
Registered:
February 2004
|
|
Re: Nissan Exa vs mk3 toyota supra
|
Mon, 01 March 2004 22:52
|
|
|
Jayem - thats harsh dude
|
|
|
Location:
Brisbane
Registered:
July 2002
|
|
Re: Nissan Exa vs mk3 toyota supra
|
Tue, 02 March 2004 00:35
|
|
| Jayem wrote on Tue, 02 March 2004 04:24 |
This really gushes sex compared to Exa's
These are FWD too! so these must be sport cars too!
|
that things so high... its almost like a 4wd
|
|
|
Location:
Melbourne
Registered:
November 2003
|
|
Re: Nissan Exa vs mk3 toyota supra
|
Tue, 02 March 2004 02:17
|
|
Ewww.
|
|
|
Location:
Canberra
Registered:
February 2004
|
|
Re: Nissan Exa vs mk3 toyota supra
|
Wed, 03 March 2004 15:22
|
|
|
as much as i hate to admit it, an exa would probably smoke my car no worries. im not too keen on how the exas look either, although of course im going to be biased because the only exa owner i know is a complete knob jockey. what is the 0 - 100 on a stock exa?
|
|
|
Location:
Melbourne
Registered:
July 2004
|
|
Re: Nissan Exa vs mk3 toyota supra
|
Thu, 08 July 2004 08:40
|
|
hey, i'm looking to buy an exa, because other than the corolla's theyre probably the best buy for your buck at $3500 or less, which is all i have :S. so does anyone know any nissan forums or anything in australia so i can pick one up real cheap ? if anyone could help it would be much appreciated, thanks.
btw i live in melbourne.
-daniel
|
|
|
Location:
Brisbane
Registered:
July 2002
|
|
Re: Nissan Exa vs mk3 toyota supra
|
Thu, 08 July 2004 11:42
|
|
www.nissanexa.com
beware.. its full of gaybo's..... i mean..... cool guys with cool cars...........................................
shoot me please...
|
|
|
Location:
Brisbane
Registered:
June 2003
|
|
Re: Nissan Exa vs mk3 toyota supra
|
Thu, 08 July 2004 11:44
|
|
man my ma70 NON TURBO can beat exas
Although Ur ca18 model would be surprisingly faster than a stock pos one obviously.
|
|
|
Location:
Brisbane
Registered:
July 2002
|
|
Re: Nissan Exa vs mk3 toyota supra
|
Thu, 08 July 2004 12:13
|
|
| V8_MA61 wrote on Thu, 08 July 2004 21:44 |
man my ma70 NON TURBO can beat exas
Although Ur ca18 model would be surprisingly faster than a stock pos one obviously.
|
doesent matter how fast they are.. they are still gay
get a vl with that much.. heaps better
|
|
|
Location:
Brisbane
Registered:
June 2003
|
|
Re: Nissan Exa vs mk3 toyota supra
|
Thu, 08 July 2004 12:15
|
|
|
i didnt say they werent gay
|
|
|
Location:
Ballarat, Victoria
Registered:
March 2003
|
|
Re: Nissan Exa vs mk3 toyota supra
|
Wed, 14 July 2004 04:08
|
|
umm.... isn't an exa just the coupe model of the pulsar ET?
well, didn't they start off that way (the N12?)
so while pinky fluffy duck sits there and bags out the rollas and other grandmas cars... when his is really a pulsar with the back seats chopped out?
|
|
|
Location:
Brisbane
Registered:
June 2003
|
|
Re: Nissan Exa vs mk3 toyota supra
|
Wed, 14 July 2004 08:11
|
|
| Evil_Foetus wrote on Wed, 14 July 2004 14:08 |
umm.... isn't an exa just the coupe model of the pulsar ET?
well, didn't they start off that way (the N12?)
so while pinky fluffy duck sits there and bags out the rollas and other grandmas cars... when his is really a pulsar with the back seats chopped out?
|
|
|
|
Location:
Brisbane
Registered:
July 2002
|
|
Re: Nissan Exa vs mk3 toyota supra
|
Wed, 14 July 2004 09:34
|
|
| V8_MA61 wrote on Wed, 14 July 2004 18:11 |
| Evil_Foetus wrote on Wed, 14 July 2004 14:08 |
umm.... isn't an exa just the coupe model of the pulsar ET?
well, didn't they start off that way (the N12?)
so while pinky fluffy duck sits there and bags out the rollas and other grandmas cars... when his is really a pulsar with the back seats chopped out?
|
|
|
|
|
Location:
Melbourne - NthSubs
Registered:
January 2004
|
|
Re: Nissan Exa vs mk3 toyota supra
|
Sun, 18 July 2004 14:28
|
|
wat about fully sik Excel
any one know the specs on these things 
just in case 
|
|
|
Location:
sydney
Registered:
July 2004
|
|
Re: Nissan Exa vs mk3 toyota supra
|
Sun, 18 July 2004 14:41
|
|
exa's are ok i spose my mates one was faded and leaked at every seal still pulled hard.
still rather a toyota anyday of the week
|
|
|
