| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
Terrigal
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
The 3t-gte beats rb20det
|
Mon, 24 June 2002 00:55
|
 |
Went for a cruise yesturday up Newcastle way. Had a mate with a rb20det in 280z come along. Anyway for a bit of fun and to get an idea of power differences we cruised along at about 90km/h then at the same time floored both cars.. The 3t-gte pulled away from the rb quite easily. Both are running stock boost also.
Anyway was quite happy with that.. Except another mate with a g63b starion engine in a lancer left both the rb and 3t for dead 
hmmm have to get an IC and more boost!
|
|
|
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: The 3t-gte beats rb20det
|
Sat, 29 June 2002 14:57
|
|
u mean 4g63 ... evo engines or fr galant ?? are they 2 litre turbo
what typa lancer is it ????
i wouldnt mind slotting one of them in me lancer ! 
|
|
|
I supported Toymods
Location:
Perth
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: The 3t-gte beats rb20det
|
Mon, 01 July 2002 00:38
|
|
Are you talking about an old Lancer? As in the old Chrysler ones? Much better than a shoddy rice-mobile 
|
|
|
Location:
The Rainy City
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: The 3t-gte beats rb20det
|
Mon, 01 July 2002 00:45
|
|
4g63 Starion engine : 2.0 Single cam, wet manifold injection =/ no I/C and runs hot as a bitch. I know cos i have one  remind me to take a 3t for a run heheheh
|
|
|
I supported Toymods
Location:
Perth
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: The 3t-gte beats rb20det
|
Mon, 01 July 2002 00:55
|
|
I know the feeling...I USED to have one
Only difference was mine was an 82 JA Starion with an engine from an 89 JDM Starion. Pity it wasn't a DASH, but it was intercooled which was a bonus
|
|
|
Location:
Western Victoria
Registered:
September 2004
|
|
|
I supported Toymods
Location:
Perth
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: The 3t-gte beats rb20det
|
Tue, 21 September 2004 08:53
|
|
Where did you pull 750kg from dude? You've underestimated the RA28 weight, and overestimated the 280ZX weight. If you're going to have a whinge, get it right!
And why did you dregde up such an old thread?
|
|
|
Location:
Western Victoria
Registered:
September 2004
|
|
|
I supported Toymods
Location:
Perth
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: The 3t-gte beats rb20det
|
Tue, 21 September 2004 09:08
|
|
| RT104GT wrote on Tue, 21 September 2004 17:00 |
handbook page 78 kerb weight manual 1261 kg. 2+2 1255 kg. Plus fuel plus passenger 80 litres of fuel is 60 kg one dude is 85 thats about 1400 kg in my money. you made the boast OK so the RA28 is 1000 kg but the 3TGTE is lighter than the 2TC. 3TGTE is old technology had one in a T18 in 1984 pssobly before you were born.
|
Ok, so you add weight to the 280ZX but not the RA28? An RA28 weighs about 1000kg+ before you add this fuel and driver. Magically, adding a twin-cam head and a turbo and manifold and intercooler suddenly makes the 3TGTE makes it weigh less than a 2T-C?
Dude, you epitomize why age doesn't bring you intelligence. When you choose to contribute with facts rather than BS do so, but don't spout shit. Besides, I didn't make any boast, just pointing out that brown stuff coming from your mouth...I mean keyboard.
|
|
|
Location:
NSW
Registered:
October 2003
|
|
Re: The 3t-gte beats rb20det
|
Tue, 21 September 2004 09:09
|
|
| RT104GT wrote on Tue, 21 September 2004 18:49 |
Wow some contest
Whats your point here? Its called accelerating mass to velocity 165 horse power in 750 KG vs 250 in 1400 kg.
You had the equivalent of 50 horse power more.
Try out running one with the 25DTT engine and 400 kg lighter with no power nuttin, no air, no power steering no power windows, no power mirrors..and see how you survive against 500 horsepower.
Then try and stop from 200 k and see which car your celica or my four spot ventilated four-wheel disc brakes will stop.
You name time and place.
|
Whats your go you tool? I think he was just pointing out something that happened, dont think he was saying that his car could beat something with 500hp, besides that...his post was over 2 years ago 
|
|
|
I supported Toymods
Location:
Perth
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: The 3t-gte beats rb20det
|
Tue, 21 September 2004 09:11
|
|
| RT104GT wrote on Tue, 21 September 2004 16:49 |
Wow some contest
Whats your point here? Its called accelerating mass to velocity 165 horse power in 750 KG vs 250 in 1400 kg.
You had the equivalent of 50 horse power more.
Try out running one with the 25DTT engine and 400 kg lighter with no power nuttin, no air, no power steering no power windows, no power mirrors..and see how you survive against 500 horsepower.
Then try and stop from 200 k and see which car your celica or my four spot ventilated four-wheel disc brakes will stop.
You name time and place.
|
Bahaha, nice update. Dude, stop pulling it, your car looks cool, too bad you're the driver. Stop trolling and go drive your car and get it out of your system.
|
|
|
Location:
Castle Hill, Sydney
Registered:
February 2004
|
|
Re: The 3t-gte beats rb20det
|
Tue, 21 September 2004 09:15
|
|
i was about to say, but joel? isnt your 3tgte in pieces
then i realise the post is...
TWO YEARS OLD!!!!!!
|
|
|
Location:
Inside a giant turbo (syd...
Registered:
June 2002
|
|
Re: The 3t-gte beats rb20det
|
Wed, 22 September 2004 12:21
|
|
|
hahahaha "im old, that makes me cool"
|
|
|
Location:
Ballarat, Victoria
Registered:
March 2003
|
|
Re: The 3t-gte beats rb20det
|
Thu, 23 September 2004 08:42
|
|
| Spanktown wrote on Wed, 22 September 2004 22:21 |
hahahaha "im old, that makes me cool"
|
lol yes
i owned a celica before you were born!
i command massiv respekt
i hope im not farting around a car forum when im old  
|
|
|
Location:
Brisbane
Registered:
July 2002
|
|
Re: The 3t-gte beats rb20det
|
Fri, 24 September 2004 13:12
|
|
| RT104GT wrote on Tue, 21 September 2004 18:49 |
Wow some contest
Whats your point here? Its called accelerating mass to velocity 165 horse power in 750 KG vs 250 in 1400 kg.
You had the equivalent of 50 horse power more.
Try out running one with the 25DTT engine and 400 kg lighter with no power nuttin, no air, no power steering no power windows, no power mirrors..and see how you survive against 500 horsepower.
Then try and stop from 200 k and see which car your celica or my four spot ventilated four-wheel disc brakes will stop.
You name time and place.
|
your my hero
|
|
|
Location:
Melbourne
Registered:
January 2003
|
|
|
Location:
Castle Hill, Sydney
Registered:
February 2004
|
|
Re: The 3t-gte beats rb20det
|
Sat, 25 September 2004 04:53
|
|
RT104GT
YOUR SOOOOOOO GAY
|
|
|
Location:
Baulko Hillo
Registered:
April 2004
|
|
Re: The 3t-gte beats rb20det
|
Sat, 25 September 2004 09:49
|
|
|
J00 15 73h m4551f d0ng
|
|
|
Location:
Terrigal
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: The 3t-gte beats rb20det
|
Thu, 30 September 2004 05:16
|
|
Haha thats funny
All the above cars mentioned (ra28, 280z, lancer) are off the road now. Bummer
But soon will be all back and better I hope.
Dunno what the shit is about with you RT104GT.. It was just a post about some mates of mine having some fun and the results.
But seeing as your undies are in a knot about weights and shit..
All the cars have been on a weight bridge for engineering requirements.
The RA28 cames in at 1120kg or so. That is with full tank of fuel and no driver.
The 280Z is hmm i think 1280kg again full tank fuel no driver.
The 75 Lancer was dead on 900kg.
So yeah definately some weight differences there, but also a wide variety of engines. It was just a comparison and some fun nothing more.
Cheers
Joel
|
|
|
Location:
Sydney
Registered:
September 2004
|
|
Re: The 3t-gte beats rb20det
|
Thu, 30 September 2004 07:05
|
|
| RT104GT wrote on Tue, 21 September 2004 18:49 |
Wow some contest
Whats your point here? Its called accelerating mass to velocity 165 horse power in 750 KG vs 250 in 1400 kg.
You had the equivalent of 50 horse power more.
Try out running one with the 25DTT engine and 400 kg lighter with no power nuttin, no air, no power steering no power windows, no power mirrors..and see how you survive against 500 horsepower.
Then try and stop from 200 k and see which car your celica or my four spot ventilated four-wheel disc brakes will stop.
You name time and place.
|
relax children
|
|
|
Location:
Sydney
Registered:
September 2004
|
|
Re: The 3t-gte beats rb20det
|
Thu, 30 September 2004 07:08
|
|
i think he was just angered in the spur of the moment
regardless, it's YOU'RE not YOUR
get it right ladies
that's probably the most common grammatical error
the other one that comes to mind is he's and his
|
|
|
Location:
Castle Hill, Sydney
Registered:
February 2004
|
|
|
Location:
Newcastle
Registered:
June 2002
|
|
Re: The 3t-gte beats rb20det
|
Thu, 30 September 2004 16:01
|
|
|
haha its probly token
|
|
|
