| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
Coffs Harbour
Registered:
October 2004
|
|
88 Rolla with 4AGE Versus 89 St162
|
Thu, 14 October 2004 10:10
|
 |
|
hey guys was wonderin ya opinons on who would win in a race between an 88 rolla with a 4AGE and a St162sx celica ?? thanks lads both bout 100 kw arnt they, also over a distance ?
|
|
|
I supported Toymods
Location:
sydney.au
Registered:
August 2002
|
|
Re: 88 Rolla with 4AGE Versus 89 St162
|
Thu, 14 October 2004 11:07
|
|
the lighter car
arent those engines identical?
|
|
|
Location:
Epping, Sydney
Registered:
April 2003
|
|
Re: 88 Rolla with 4AGE Versus 89 St162
|
Thu, 14 October 2004 11:12
|
|
off the factory floor I think the rolla is quicker
rolla = 100kw at fly (motor = 4age), celica 103kw at fly (motor = 3sge)
but I beat any rolla I have raced... 
|
|
|
Location:
Coffs Harbour
Registered:
October 2004
|
|
Re: 88 Rolla with 4AGE Versus 89 St162
|
Thu, 14 October 2004 11:31
|
|
|
yeh true hey, ill have 2 do some mods to beat my mates new rolla then,
|
|
|
Location:
Potts Point, Sydney
Registered:
October 2003
|
|
Re: 88 Rolla with 4AGE Versus 89 St162
|
Thu, 14 October 2004 11:36
|
|
try beat a 20V turbo, about 250kw at the wheels 
|
|
|
Location:
melbourne
Registered:
November 2003
|
|
Re: 88 Rolla with 4AGE Versus 89 St162
|
Thu, 14 October 2004 13:55
|
|
that just like saying race a completely worked gen3 3sgte gt4. what a silly statement to make.
20v turbo is a hybrid engine, u cant really compare it to anything that came off the factory floor.
|
|
|
Registered:
June 2003
|
|
|
Location:
Coffs Harbour
Registered:
October 2004
|
|
Re: 88 Rolla with 4AGE Versus 89 St162
|
Sat, 16 October 2004 05:57
|
|
|
true, yeh better make the race with a corner or 2 invloved then, thanks
|
|
|
Location:
melbourne
Registered:
November 2003
|
|
Re: 88 Rolla with 4AGE Versus 89 St162
|
Sat, 16 October 2004 10:07
|
|
i wouldnt say kill, but yes it has teh advantage in handling becuase of its lower/wider body. however the revy 4age is still in there with a chance. stock suspension isnt to horrible, breakes are awsome if they are in good condition (all disk breakes, and i think the fronts are ventilated), and the revy 4age means u will be able to keep it in power band the whole race.
dont let the revs drop if ur in the rolla, cause the downlow power of the celica will give it the edge it needs to win over the rolla.
also, is the celica a manual? there are lots of auto;s and very few manuals is all.
manual rolla compared to a celica auto, the rolla will kill it. especially if there are corners involved.
|
|
|
Location:
Canberra
Registered:
April 2003
|
|
Re: 88 Rolla with 4AGE Versus 89 St162
|
Sat, 16 October 2004 11:32
|
|
| RobST162 wrote on Thu, 14 October 2004 21:12 |
off the factory floor I think the rolla is quicker
rolla = 100kw at fly (motor = 4age), celica 103kw at fly (motor = 3sge)
but I beat any rolla I have raced...
|
Ummm Rob  in an 88 rolla they had the 86kw at the fly bigport, not the 100kw
up to about 120km you's probably be dead equal (well soo close) if both cars are stock
|
|
|
Location:
toowoomba qld
Registered:
March 2004
|
|
Re: 88 Rolla with 4AGE Versus 89 St162
|
Sun, 17 October 2004 23:41
|
|
|
I personally thing the Celica would come on top there wouldn't be much in it though. (if stock and both manual), the Celica would be the better handler but all depends on driver too.
|
|
|
Location:
Sydney
Registered:
May 2004
|
|
Re: 88 Rolla with 4AGE Versus 89 St162
|
Mon, 18 October 2004 21:44
|
|
|
the 3sge has heaps more torque tho doesn't it?
|
|
|
