Toymods Car Club
www.toymods.org.au
F.A.Q. F.A.Q.    Register Register    Login Login    Home Home
Members Members    Search Search
Toymods » General Car Talk » 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer (was rather impressed)*shocked*

Show: Today's Posts  :: Show Polls 
Email to friend 
Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
AuthorTopic
mick
Forums Junkie


Location:
toowoomba qld
Registered:
March 2004
2004 Mitsubishi Lancer (was rather impressed)*shocked* Mon, 18 October 2004 01:25 Go to next message
A mate I work with recently traded his VR Lexcen in for a 2004 Lancer VRX. although I didn't like the front ends looks much and the interiour looks very different too me for some reason (I reckon I could live with it but) I must say this Lancer isn't a bad little car, very comfortable indeed, very nice ride,has one of thoese sequensial shift thingy's. I must say I thought when he said it was an auto it would be slow being a 4-cyl. but it seemed to pick up alright for what it is. I know it's not a Toyota but for once a Lancer I like Shocked strange Confused enough sticking up for Mitsubishi. go TOYOTA!!!!!!!! Very Happy
  Send a private message to this user    
Mookie
Forums Junkie


Location:
Tassie
Registered:
October 2003
Re: 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer (was rather impressed)*shocked* Mon, 18 October 2004 02:48 Go to previous messageGo to next message
I drove 1 for work.
It was the manual and i found all the grunt was in between 4000 and 6000 (it's not mine so i can thrash it lol )
But trying to get to 4000 i found was a struggle.
The handling was very good i found in the short distance i drove it.
  Send a private message to this user    
rsdeo
Regular


Location:
Burlington, On. Canada
Registered:
January 2004
Re: 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer (was rather impressed)*shocked* Mon, 18 October 2004 05:52 Go to previous messageGo to next message
In Canada the EVO is not available due to the car having a front mounted intercooler and it being damaged in our tough front bumper hit test.

Only the FWD Lancers are available in different models, the two top being the OZ Rally and RalliArt versions. The RalliArt by far being the best. Bigger engine, 2.4L with variable valve timing. Bigger brakes and only one with discs all around. 5 bolt hubs. Full mandrel bent stainless sport exhaust with mandrel bent stainless header. You get the idea. To see more go here, http://www.mitsubishicars.ca/MMSA/jsp/lancer/index .jsp . Only 2004 models listed as of yet, but the same as 2005s.

I needed to buy a 4 door car because someone had to pick up my two nieces from nursery school every Thursday. I couldn't use the MA67 (stored winter anyway) and the 4x4 Tacoma. Both only two doors and very small rear seats. So I bought a brand new 2005 RalliArt after looking at a ton of other cars. I didn't need anything too big and too fast, I had the other two Toyotas. I had to be able to fit being 6'4" tall and still have room in the back seat.

Here are some pics after I picked it up 3 weeks ago and it had 10km on the clock.

http://www.ilkt.com/celicasupra/mlraeng1.jpg

http://www.ilkt.com/celicasupra/mlrain2.jpg

http://www.ilkt.com/celicasupra/mlrain3.jpg

http://www.ilkt.com/celicasupra/mlraout4.jpg

http://www.ilkt.com/celicasupra/mlraout5.jpg

http://www.ilkt.com/celicasupra/mlraout6.jpg

http://www.ilkt.com/celicasupra/mlraout7.jpg

http://www.ilkt.com/celicasupra/mlraout9.jpg

[Updated on: Mon, 18 October 2004 06:04]

  Send a private message to this user    
old_mr2
Forums Junkie


Location:
Newcastle
Registered:
June 2002
Re: 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer (was rather impressed)*shocked* Mon, 18 October 2004 21:13 Go to previous messageGo to next message
My freakin eyes! Crying or Very Sad
  Send a private message to this user    
rsdeo
Regular


Location:
Burlington, On. Canada
Registered:
January 2004
Re: 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer (was rather impressed)*shocked* Tue, 19 October 2004 00:53 Go to previous messageGo to next message
old_mr2 wrote on Mon, 18 October 2004 17:13

My freakin eyes! Crying or Very Sad


Why the sad face?

[Updated on: Tue, 19 October 2004 00:54]

  Send a private message to this user    
mick
Forums Junkie


Location:
toowoomba qld
Registered:
March 2004
Re: 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer (was rather impressed)*shocked* Wed, 20 October 2004 02:15 Go to previous messageGo to next message
yeah I don't mind them, the seem like a nice little car to get about in.
  Send a private message to this user    
whip
Occasional Poster


Location:
Adelaide, SA.
Registered:
May 2004
Re: 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer (was rather impressed)*shocked* Thu, 21 October 2004 04:45 Go to previous messageGo to next message
i dont fully understand why they call it a 2005 model....

when clearly....


looks like a schmick car, though.
  Send a private message to this user    
rsdeo
Regular


Location:
Burlington, On. Canada
Registered:
January 2004
Re: 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer (was rather impressed)*shocked* Fri, 22 October 2004 04:40 Go to previous message
whip wrote on Thu, 21 October 2004 00:45

i dont fully understand why they call it a 2005 model....

when clearly....


looks like a schmick car, though.


Because it was built for the 2005 model year.........
  Send a private message to this user    
  Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Previous Topic:Amp problem
Next Topic:URGENT - good soarer mechanic in PERTH???
Goto Forum:
-=] Back to Top [=-

Current Time: Wed May 8 23:52:08 UTC 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.0071067810058594 seconds

Bandwidth utilization bar

.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Powered by: FUDforum 2.3.8
Copyright ©2001-2003 Advanced Internet Designs Inc.