Toymods Car Club
www.toymods.org.au
F.A.Q. F.A.Q.    Register Register    Login Login    Home Home
Members Members    Search Search
Toymods » General Car Talk » celica confusion and soarer dissapointment

Show: Today's Posts  :: Show Polls 
Email to friend 
Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
AuthorTopic
decoyslikecurves
Regular


Location:
QLD
Registered:
October 2004
celica confusion and soarer dissapointment Sat, 27 November 2004 14:19 Go to next message
Well i went and had a look at a very clean 2l twin turbo soarer (86 model) the other day, and I have to say it was extremely dissapointing. The paintwork was exceptionally easy to makr and the car was ooohh so slow, especially for a 6 cyl relying on twin turbos. my moms xtrail is faster. still its a fairly nice car.

anyway I have decided maybe a cheaper celica is better and more reliable for the moment, so Im looking around at them
All these model names confuse me though. eg st162, st165, st184r etc etc. and the motors. is the 2 liter 3sge in the st162 faster than the 2.2 in the later model celicas? which st162 has the 3sge?. is there anything else I should know about celicas? How will a 3sge st162 go in a straight line in comparison with a sr20de silvia s13?

thanks
  Send a private message to this user    
clubagreenie
Forums Junkie


Location:
1st street on the right
Registered:
November 2002
 
Re: celica confusion and soarer dissapointment Sat, 27 November 2004 22:16 Go to previous messageGo to next message
OOff topic but we've had an xtrail for 11 mths now and don't you love how much room is above the exhaust manifold and it's on the front side of the engine as well. Once ot's out of warranty, turbo here we go.
  Send a private message to this user    
alliance_22
Forums Junkie


Location:
Sydney
Registered:
October 2004
 
Re: celica confusion and soarer dissapointment Sat, 27 November 2004 22:22 Go to previous messageGo to next message
MATE, welcome to the 162 world Smile

http://forums.toymods.org.au/index.php?t=msg&t h=47835&start=0&rid=7702&S=9bd6a8983ff 2802f57d592b8d94d698d

all your info in this link!

u'll see how a 162 perform against

Lancers
Hondas
Silvias

etc..

have fun Very Happy

BTW: Disregard how i lost to a lancer, purely driving ability!!.


And fast facts are:

1985-1989 Celica SX:
3S-GE 103KW @6400rpm (i think at that rpm) (Non camry engine)
1160KG
0-100km in 9.6 seconds for a stocker not clutch dumping
0-100km fastest for my friend recorded for 8.5 sec

1985-1989 Celica ST:
3S-FE 78?kw (camry engine)
1160KG
0-100km in over 12sec?

1989-1993 Celica SX/ST:
5S-FE 100Kw @ 6400rpm (Camry engine)
1300+KG
0-100km in 10-11sec (Sometimes even with a ST162)

ALSO if you wanna go hardcore, you can get:

1986-1989
Celica GT4 ST165
3S-GTE Turbo motor with 130KW+ engine
1200KG (More i think, cant remember)
0-100km in the 6-7 sec bracket i think....

other fellaz will fill u in! Very Happy

  Send a private message to this user    
finney
Forums Junkie


Location:
Sydney
Registered:
September 2003
Re: celica confusion and soarer dissapointment Sun, 28 November 2004 03:09 Go to previous messageGo to next message
if you can find an st165 check em out, haven't seen any around yet. they would be a little bit heavier than a 162 due to the AWD. also i think they can come with climate control and much better front seats with a leather trim amongst other things.
  Send a private message to this user    
crazedrt104
Regular


Location:
Darwin
Registered:
March 2003
Re: celica confusion and soarer dissapointment Tue, 30 November 2004 04:35 Go to previous messageGo to next message
yup...st165...electric leather seats (lumbar support thingy)..climate control...elec window and mirrors and 3sgte goodness
  Send a private message to this user    
Chris Davey
Forums Junkie


Location:
sunny coast, qld
Registered:
October 2002
Re: celica confusion and soarer dissapointment Tue, 30 November 2004 11:21 Go to previous messageGo to next message
i don't see how you can say that a gz20 soarer is slow compared to a st162. I used to own a gz20 and i know they aren't the quickest thing but once they get moving they accelerate pretty well. I think the 0-100 times would be pretty similar to the 162 however, from a roll I would put my money on a gz20 anyday. I found them a bit laggy which doesn't help getting it off the line but once on boost it was pretty good.

and come on,

soarer

or

celica


You know you want the street cred! Razz
  Send a private message to this user    
Jag7799
Forums Junkie


Location:
Brisbane
Registered:
July 2002
 
Re: celica confusion and soarer dissapointment Tue, 30 November 2004 11:34 Go to previous message
Chris Davey wrote on Tue, 30 November 2004 22:21

i don't see how you can say that a gz20 soarer is slow compared to a st162. I used to own a gz20 and i know they aren't the quickest thing but once they get moving they accelerate pretty well. I think the 0-100 times would be pretty similar to the 162 however, from a roll I would put my money on a gz20 anyday. I found them a bit laggy which doesn't help getting it off the line but once on boost it was pretty good.

and come on,

soarer

or

celica


You know you want the street cred! Razz


manual would solve the laggyness probs too
  Send a private message to this user    
  Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Previous Topic:Ferrino
Next Topic:PETROL PRICE ----> Plans to decrease this ONCE AND FOR ALL!
Goto Forum:
-=] Back to Top [=-

Current Time: Mon Apr 29 12:31:09 UTC 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.0050840377807617 seconds

Bandwidth utilization bar

.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Powered by: FUDforum 2.3.8
Copyright ©2001-2003 Advanced Internet Designs Inc.