| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
Newcastle
Registered:
August 2003
|
|
Cappacino vs AE86 (Initial D based)
|
Wed, 23 February 2005 13:36
|
 |
I only have ever used one on Gran Turismo, however with even twice its performance on that game in real life I find it a little hard to imagine beating a AE86 w Forula Atlantic engine). Well I guess it was meant to be totaly downhill and can have gravity assist it, but still it has to partially have some grunt to get it rolling so to speak.
|
|
|
I Supported Toymods
Location:
south Melbourne/KL
Registered:
June 2004
|
|
Re: Cappacino vs AE86 (Initial D based)
|
Wed, 23 February 2005 14:41
|
|
|
spotted in melbourne CBD russell street. capucino turbo!!! vvrroooomm pppssshhtt!!!!
|
|
|
Location:
Melbourne
Registered:
June 2004
|
|
Re: Cappacino vs AE86 (Initial D based)
|
Wed, 23 February 2005 15:15
|
|
| b1gb3n wrote on Thu, 24 February 2005 01:41 |
spotted in melbourne CBD russell street. capucino turbo!!! vvrroooomm pppssshhtt!!!!
|
DECAF plates?
when i was buying rims, this guy who was selling a set of BBS owned a cappachino... he was kind enough to take me for a ride around the block... the thing would kill anything........ in a 5m drag... but its so much of a fun car... it was silver and he lived in the CBD too
anyway on topic... in initial d... didn't hte cappa lose anyway?
|
|
|
Location:
Perth
Registered:
October 2004
|
|
Re: Cappacino vs AE86 (Initial D based)
|
Wed, 23 February 2005 16:21
|
|
My friend had a Cappuccino before he bought his Soarer.
For .6 litre turbo engine making 47kw, it goes pretty well in its 700kg shell. The car was always a lot of fun. He had plans to stroke it, strengthen the internals, up the boost and add a roll cage. Would have been an awesome track car.
|
|
|
I Supported Toymods
Location:
south Melbourne/KL
Registered:
June 2004
|
|
Re: Cappacino vs AE86 (Initial D based)
|
Wed, 23 February 2005 18:47
|
|
| ShiRi wrote on Thu, 24 February 2005 02:15 |
| b1gb3n wrote on Thu, 24 February 2005 01:41 |
spotted in melbourne CBD russell street. capucino turbo!!! vvrroooomm pppssshhtt!!!!
|
DECAF plates?
when i was buying rims, this guy who was selling a set of BBS owned a cappachino... he was kind enough to take me for a ride around the block... the thing would kill anything........ in a 5m drag... but its so much of a fun car... it was silver and he lived in the CBD too
anyway on topic... in initial d... didn't hte cappa lose anyway?
|
i dont think it was silver. its some light faded color, but shiny kinda paint. can tell its a good paintjob
|
|
|
Location:
Sydney
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: Cappacino vs AE86 (Initial D based)
|
Wed, 23 February 2005 21:37
|
|
each to their own
50KW in a 700KG car, or
130KW in a 1000KG car
do the maths, give me my sprinter anyday.
Ben.
|
|
|
Location:
Campbelltown
Registered:
November 2003
|
|
Re: Cappacino vs AE86 (Initial D based)
|
Wed, 23 February 2005 21:54
|
|
what about the cappucino 2 wasn't that supposed to get a 2.0l turbo V8, saw it years ago in a mag i'm talking mid nineties did it ever happen 
|
|
|
Location:
Sydney, shire
Registered:
June 2004
|
|
Re: Cappacino vs AE86 (Initial D based)
|
Wed, 23 February 2005 23:20
|
|
There is a cappa in a zoom mag not long ago...this thing was beast making like 140kw at the wheels...He said a guy who owned a brand new SS ute got the suprise of his life when the cappa munched him 
|
|
|
Location:
Melbourne
Registered:
March 2004
|
|
Re: Cappacino vs AE86 (Initial D based)
|
Thu, 24 February 2005 01:00
|
|
The Cappaccino 2 had a 1.6l V8 making around 250hp, from memory. It was ugly as a hatful of arseholes, but goddamn that'd be cool 
|
|
|
Location:
Brisbane
Registered:
July 2002
|
|
Re: Cappacino vs AE86 (Initial D based)
|
Thu, 24 February 2005 02:29
|
|
Took a Capuccino for a test drive a long time ago (2 yrs) ... but then I saw Takumi beat it so I bought a sprinter instead. 
|
|
|
Location:
sydney
Registered:
November 2003
|
|
|
Location:
sydney
Registered:
November 2003
|
|
|
Location:
Melbourne
Registered:
June 2004
|
|
Re: Cappacino vs AE86 (Initial D based)
|
Thu, 24 February 2005 05:32
|
|
| fatmr2 wrote on Thu, 24 February 2005 16:24 |
I also know of the DECAF car you speak of. This car is a shit crate. It had been in a smash before the original guy bought it. The guys mum bought him those plates.
|
im talking about a melbourne car  ... the owner is female
|
|
|
Location:
sydney
Registered:
November 2003
|
|
Re: Cappacino vs AE86 (Initial D based)
|
Thu, 24 February 2005 05:35
|
|
| ShiRi wrote on Thu, 24 February 2005 16:32 |
| fatmr2 wrote on Thu, 24 February 2005 16:24 |
I also know of the DECAF car you speak of. This car is a shit crate. It had been in a smash before the original guy bought it. The guys mum bought him those plates.
|
im talking about a melbourne car ... the owner is female
|
My apologies.
But the one in Sydney is still shit 
|
|
|
I supported Toymods
Location:
Perth
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: Cappacino vs AE86 (Initial D based)
|
Thu, 24 February 2005 05:39
|
|
| fatmr2 wrote on Thu, 24 February 2005 13:24 |
Oh and all caps come from the factory as a 657cc twin cam 12 valve turbo with 47kw at the wheels.
|
At the engine you mean
|
|
|
Location:
sydney
Registered:
November 2003
|
|
|
Location:
melbourne
Registered:
February 2005
|
|
Re: Cappacino vs AE86 (Initial D based)
|
Thu, 24 February 2005 09:02
|
|
dont under est these small cars!!!
unless they got some fat guy about 300kg sitting in it (if he'll fit)
i dont think there big person friendly!
whats the size limit u reckon?
me being 6foot 4 and 120kg whats my chances of fitting into one?
or r they more like n mx5 n if ur feet r bigger than size ten u cant fit ur feet down with the pedals properly (feel like a clown n end up crackn the shits n jumping outa the car, happened to while driving family friends car in qld)
|
|
|
Location:
sydney
Registered:
November 2003
|
|
Re: Cappacino vs AE86 (Initial D based)
|
Thu, 24 February 2005 09:09
|
|
One of my mates is just over 6 foot and weighs 110kg's and he fit in my brothers Cap.
I think they had to take the roof off to get him out
Im about 176cm and i fit in ok.
They are a very deceiving little car in more ways than one.
|
|
|
Location:
Newcastle
Registered:
June 2002
|
|
Re: Cappacino vs AE86 (Initial D based)
|
Thu, 24 February 2005 17:11
|
|
| justcallmefrank wrote on Thu, 24 February 2005 16:39 |
| fatmr2 wrote on Thu, 24 February 2005 13:24 |
Oh and all caps come from the factory as a 657cc twin cam 12 valve turbo with 47kw at the wheels.
|
At the engine you mean
|
| fatmr2 wrote on Thu, 24 February 2005 17:11 |
Sorry, yeah at the wheels.
Kick ass little cars iwas thinking of building one myself but i dont think i could get it to go faster than my bro's. He has too much $$$ 
|
Hahaha, no, at the ENGINE!!!!!!
|
|
|
Location:
sydney
Registered:
November 2003
|
|
Re: Cappacino vs AE86 (Initial D based)
|
Fri, 25 February 2005 04:20
|
|
| old_mr2 wrote on Fri, 25 February 2005 04:11 |
| justcallmefrank wrote on Thu, 24 February 2005 16:39 |
| fatmr2 wrote on Thu, 24 February 2005 13:24 |
Oh and all caps come from the factory as a 657cc twin cam 12 valve turbo with 47kw at the wheels.
|
At the engine you mean
|
| fatmr2 wrote on Thu, 24 February 2005 17:11 |
Sorry, yeah at the wheels.
Kick ass little cars iwas thinking of building one myself but i dont think i could get it to go faster than my bro's. He has too much $$$
|
Hahaha, no, at the ENGINE!!!!!!
|
All of it has been fixed now 
Engines,wheels........Fuck im mixed up
|
|
|
Location:
Rosanna, Melb
Registered:
June 2002
|
|
Re: Cappacino vs AE86 (Initial D based)
|
Fri, 25 February 2005 05:47
|
|
A guy who used to work at AEM in Melbourne (they make Wolf3D) had a 20V turbo in a Cappucino. Engine built properly with low comp pistons and lots of other work done. I saw it while it was running but not totally finished. Not sure if it did ever get finished, but that thing would have eaten anything on the road. And still been good round the corners.
The driver was near on 6foot and said he fitted ok, but any taller would have problems.
Hen
|
|
|
Location:
sydney
Registered:
November 2003
|
|
Re: Cappacino vs AE86 (Initial D based)
|
Fri, 25 February 2005 06:30
|
|
A cappuccino has a front rear weight balance of about 52/48 if i remember correctly. Putting a bigger engine in a cap is like putting a 1uzf in a sprinter. It stuffs up the weight balance heaps. Something which you sprinter boys would appreciate.
In japan they put 13b rotors in them for race cars. Now that would kick ass!
I have picked my brothers whole engine up once before. The gearbox can be picked up with one hand. I wish i would have measured the block when i saw it the other day. The engine would be the size of a shoebox I'll see if i can dig up a photo or two....
|
|
|
Location:
sydney
Registered:
November 2003
|
|
|
