Author | Topic |
Registered: October 2004
|
|
|
Location: Brisbane
Registered: February 2004
|
Re: NO NO NO****Fast and furious 3*****NO NO NO
|
Thu, 09 June 2005 14:44
|
|
bet you still go see it though
|
|
|
Location: Perth, WA
Registered: December 2004
|
Re: NO NO NO****Fast and furious 3*****NO NO NO
|
Thu, 09 June 2005 14:52
|
|
Dust wrote on Thu, 09 June 2005 22:44 | bet you still go see it though
|
no shit, even a shitty movie about car racing has my $11 to go see it.
Eldar.O.
|
|
|
Location: South Australia
Registered: July 2002
|
Re: NO NO NO****Fast and furious 3*****NO NO NO
|
Thu, 09 June 2005 15:08
|
|
Fark me that sounds like a bad concept...possibly an even worse concept than Too Fast, Too Furious.
|
|
|
Location: Perth
Registered: May 2005
|
Re: NO NO NO****Fast and furious 3*****NO NO NO
|
Thu, 09 June 2005 15:11
|
|
nothing beats the original 2 fast 2 furious wasnt even about street racing!
I would still go see it as ricer movies get me horney
|
|
|
Location: Newcastle
Registered: August 2003
|
Re: NO NO NO****Fast and furious 3*****NO NO NO
|
Thu, 09 June 2005 15:51
|
|
If u think that jap chicks r fugly pork chop lookin, Ill have em then!
At least they got rid of Paul Walker.... Cant be much worse than him!
|
|
|
Location: UK
Registered: August 2003
|
Re: NO NO NO****Fast and furious 3*****NO NO NO
|
Thu, 09 June 2005 16:37
|
|
Oh god...
Not another one.. I hope there ar eno supras in it this time!!
|
|
|
Location: Melbourne
Registered: November 2002
|
Re: NO NO NO****Fast and furious 3*****NO NO NO
|
Thu, 09 June 2005 23:02
|
|
paul walker was alright
|
|
|
Location: Melbourne - NthSubs
Registered: January 2004
|
Re: NO NO NO****Fast and furious 3*****NO NO NO
|
Thu, 09 June 2005 23:54
|
|
he need more tofu
|
|
|
Location: Camden, NSW
Registered: June 2002
|
Re: NO NO NO****Fast and furious 3*****NO NO NO
|
Thu, 09 June 2005 23:55
|
|
paul walker is a tool
|
|
|
Location: Brisbane
Registered: March 2005
|
Re: NO NO NO****Fast and furious 3*****NO NO NO
|
Fri, 10 June 2005 00:55
|
|
im all for it. i say hurry up and make it. ill watch it and probably buy the dvd. hope its a lil better then the last though.
but all in all go 3fast 3furious
|
|
|
Location: Sydney
Registered: June 2003
|
Re: NO NO NO****Fast and furious 3*****NO NO NO
|
Fri, 10 June 2005 01:36
|
|
Why the second Fast and Furious thread??? As if one wasnt enough...
|
|
|
Location: Sydney
Registered: February 2005
|
Re: NO NO NO****Fast and furious 3*****NO NO NO
|
Fri, 10 June 2005 06:56
|
|
Caledwvech wrote on Fri, 10 June 2005 11:06 | Why the second Fast and Furious thread??? As if one wasnt enough...
|
I don't think i could agree more.....wait...yes i could.
|
|
|
Location: Campbelltown
Registered: November 2003
|
Re: NO NO NO****Fast and furious 3*****NO NO NO
|
Fri, 10 June 2005 06:58
|
|
i think we need a third that way we can have three times the whinging as well as it being three times as fast and furious.
|
|
|
Location: Sydney
Registered: February 2005
|
Re: NO NO NO****Fast and furious 3*****NO NO NO
|
Fri, 10 June 2005 07:09
|
|
You obviously don't realise these movies are the reason we have to put up with civic's and all there hecticity.
|
|
|
Location: Campbelltown
Registered: November 2003
|
Re: NO NO NO****Fast and furious 3*****NO NO NO
|
Fri, 10 June 2005 07:11
|
|
really no shit could of fooled me, yeah i know that help fuel the ricers, but it all existed befor then anyway, this just made it cool.
I hate rice as much as the next bloke, but if we keep on going on about it they win, they have evoked a reaction and thats what they want. Many ppl will go just to see if its as shit as they thought. I have only seen number one on tv haven't seen two so meh.
|
|
|
Location: Campbelltown
Registered: November 2003
|
Re: NO NO NO****Fast and furious 3*****NO NO NO
|
Fri, 10 June 2005 07:12
|
|
worst comes to worst just watch it walk out and say they was a great comedy at the top of your voice then run really fast away from all the teens holding the keys to their full sic civics and excels.
|
|
|
Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW
Registered: November 2004
|
Re: NO NO NO****Fast and furious 3*****NO NO NO
|
Fri, 10 June 2005 08:15
|
|
unforgiven wrote on Fri, 10 June 2005 17:09 | hecticity
|
that's a cool word
|
|
|
On Probation
Location: Hobart
Registered: December 2004
|
Re: NO NO NO****Fast and furious 3*****NO NO NO
|
Fri, 10 June 2005 09:15
|
|
i bet its even worse than F&F2 but that is pretty hard to beat ey!
|
|
|
Location: Brisbane
Registered: February 2004
|
Re: NO NO NO****Fast and furious 3*****NO NO NO
|
Fri, 10 June 2005 09:18
|
|
skellator wrote on Fri, 10 June 2005 18:15 |
unforgiven wrote on Fri, 10 June 2005 17:09 | hecticity
|
that's a cool word
|
Was thinkin the same thing, I can see that being the next big thing to have on the back windscreen in giant letters
HECTICITY!
|
|
|
Location: Sydney
Registered: September 2004
|
Re: NO NO NO****Fast and furious 3*****NO NO NO
|
Fri, 10 June 2005 16:25
|
|
or as a number plate...HECTCT
|
|
|
Location: Melbourne
Registered: January 2005
|
|
|
Location: Melbourne - NthSubs
Registered: January 2004
|
|
|
Location: Perth, WA
Registered: December 2004
|
Re: NO NO NO****Fast and furious 3*****NO NO NO
|
Sun, 12 June 2005 15:49
|
|
aside from the graphics and wing, that supra is a serious bit of kit,
both you and i know we wouldnt say no to having it in our driveways
Eldar.O.
|
|
|
Location: sydney
Registered: August 2004
|
Re: NO NO NO****Fast and furious 3*****NO NO NO
|
Mon, 13 June 2005 05:41
|
|
shcao wrote on Fri, 10 June 2005 09:02 | paul walker was alright
| Yeah is he a good actor.
|
|
|
Location: melbourne
Registered: October 2003
|
Re: NO NO NO****Fast and furious 3*****NO NO NO
|
Mon, 13 June 2005 07:46
|
|
the best, its a disgrace he didnt get AT LEAST one oscar for those 2 movies.
|
|
|
Location: Pine Rivers QLD
Registered: April 2005
|
Re: NO NO NO****Fast and furious 3*****NO NO NO
|
Mon, 13 June 2005 09:09
|
|
Yeah i would still go see a crap movie about cars. i even tricked my GF into seeing taxi because it "was about girls modeling not cars" lol, got her good.
That whole concept is getting a bit old though.
"To avoid jail time, Shaun is sent out of the country to live with his uncle in the military"
F&F2 to avoid jail time, he had to infiltrate some place.
it seems a bit like the same concept. just different place
|
|
|
Registered: October 2004
|
Re: NO NO NO****Fast and furious 3*****NO NO NO
|
Mon, 13 June 2005 09:16
|
|
bigg willie style wrote on Mon, 13 June 2005 17:46 | the best, its a disgrace he didnt get AT LEAST one oscar for those 2 movies.
|
nick2b wrote on Mon, 13 June 2005 15:41 |
shcao wrote on Fri, 10 June 2005 09:02 | paul walker was alright
| Yeah is he a good actor.
|
You guys aren't serious right?
|
|
|
Location: melbourne
Registered: October 2003
|
Re: NO NO NO****Fast and furious 3*****NO NO NO
|
Mon, 13 June 2005 13:16
|
|
xolent wrote on Mon, 13 June 2005 19:16 |
bigg willie style wrote on Mon, 13 June 2005 17:46 | the best, its a disgrace he didnt get AT LEAST one oscar for those 2 movies.
|
nick2b wrote on Mon, 13 June 2005 15:41 |
shcao wrote on Fri, 10 June 2005 09:02 | paul walker was alright
| Yeah is he a good actor.
|
You guys aren't serious right?
|
yeah, of course im serious, paul walker deserves an oscar
|
|
|
Location: Melbourne - NthSubs
Registered: January 2004
|
Re: NO NO NO****Fast and furious 3*****NO NO NO
|
Mon, 13 June 2005 13:22
|
|
i cant wait to see paul and vin in another movie again
|
|
|