Author | Topic |
I supported Toymods
Location: Sydney
Registered: May 2002
|
|
|
Location: Ballarat, Victoria
Registered: March 2003
|
Re: Mk.2 7MGTE vs SW20
|
Wed, 05 October 2005 11:16
|
|
Enchanter wrote on Wed, 05 October 2005 19:18 | Huhh ???
This thread lived past more than two posts ???
Why, .... no, really, WHY ?
|
you aint tim the enchanter for nuthin'
|
|
|
Location: Perth, WA
Registered: December 2004
|
Re: Mk.2 7MGTE vs SW20
|
Wed, 05 October 2005 17:25
|
|
TRD_Supra wrote on Wed, 09 March 2005 20:55 | the MA61 still does look very tuff now... newer cars look boring... the roundness jsut seems a bit to CUTE for me... i like hard edges an hard angles on the car.. makes it look sharp and fast.. rounded cars just look fluffy and flowery if that is anyway to descrive it
|
oh lets bow down to you because your the only person who's opinion matters.
SW20 will handle better and uses less fuel.
MA61 has more displacment, and more power, hence more torque, handling is shocking in comparison.
both cars weigh the same.
these are facts...
not everyone thinks the same, wanting to have a car that is big and makes its presence felt.
stop bagging out other peoples choice in cars just because you dont agree.
Its like having two boxers, one a really small quick fella, and the other a big heavy hitting fridge of a man.
Eldar.O.
|
|
|
On Probation
Location: Hobart
Registered: December 2004
|
Re: Mk.2 7MGTE vs SW20
|
Thu, 06 October 2005 01:28
|
|
only voicing my oppion, alot of other people have aswell, so don't just point it all at me mate
|
|
|
Location: Burnie, Tasmania
Registered: July 2005
|
Re: Mk.2 7MGTE vs SW20
|
Thu, 06 October 2005 02:05
|
|
As far as looks go I love the old school look of the Supra, thats why I bought one , but I think the sw30 is sweet as well.
However, going on about which one would win is like arguing which super hero would win a fight spiderman or batman, its just stupid.
|
|
|
Location: Perth
Registered: October 2004
|
Re: Mk.2 7MGTE vs SW20
|
Thu, 06 October 2005 02:36
|
|
hamgatan wrote on Wed, 05 October 2005 12:20 | later revisions of the sW20 were also a buttload lighter.. mine with the 3SGE gen III is 1050kg stock im quite sure..
|
To emphasise, he's talking about the non-turbo Bathurst model (note the lack of 'T' in the 3SGE), which has cut down features like no leather, no power steering, optional air con, and no heavy turbo gear.
A 2nd gen SW20 turbo would weigh very similarly to a 1st gen SW20 turbo with similar spec.
|
|
|
On Probation
Location: Hobart
Registered: December 2004
|
Re: Mk.2 7MGTE vs SW20
|
Fri, 07 October 2005 02:40
|
|
Enchanter wrote on Thu, 06 October 2005 13:05 | As far as looks go I love the old school look of the Supra, thats why I bought one , but I think the sw30 is sweet as well.
However, going on about which one would win is like arguing which super hero would win a fight spiderman or batman, its just stupid.
|
which is spiderman and which batman ?
|
|
|
Location: Burnie, Tasmania
Registered: July 2005
|
Re: Mk.2 7MGTE vs SW20
|
Fri, 07 October 2005 08:35
|
|
I think the Supra would have to be Batman
|
|
|