Author | Topic |
Location: sydney,nsw.oz.
Registered: July 2002
|
********* IS GOOD FOR YOU !
|
Thu, 17 July 2003 13:17
|
|
Check this out : in todays Sydney Morning Herald
"http://smh.com.au/articles/2003/07/16/105803507909 8.html"
Handy way to beat cancer
By Michael Bradley
July 17 2003
The Pope may tell you it will make you blind, but a group of Australian researchers say it has at least one medical advantage.
The more men ejaculate between the ages of 20 and 50, the less likely they are to develop prostate cancer later in life, says Professor Graham Giles, from Cancer Council Victoria.
He and his team quizzed 1079 prostate cancer patients and compared their answers with 1259 healthy men of the same age. They found the risk of developing prostate cancer was reduced by a third for men who ejaculated daily during their 20s, compared with those who did so only three times a week.
Previous studies have suggested high sexual activity could increase the risk of the cancer. But Professor Giles says those studies only covered intercourse.
The research was inspired by recent studies linking breast cancer with the number of times a women lactates.
The prostate gland is similar to a breast in that it's an organ destined to secrete a fluid," Professor Giles said. "It occurred to us that, if the seminal fluid is not flushed out of the ducts sufficiently, then chemical changes may occur which may in due course lead to an increased risk of cancer."
Professor Giles, whose study will be published in the British Journal of Urology, conceded that embarrassment may have prompted less-than-honest answers - but the work of another scientist may allay his concerns.
Anthony Smith, from the Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society, found men were far more comfortable discussing their masturbation habits than their income.
[Updated on: Fri, 18 July 2003 03:50] by Moderator
|
|
|
Location: Brisbane, QLD
Registered: February 2003
|
Re: WANKING IS GOOD FOR YOU !
|
Thu, 17 July 2003 14:27
|
|
They had a brief version of this in the West Australian today
Also stated that having sex with many different woman doesnt necesarily have the same effect
|
|
|
Location: Cabramatta, NSW
Registered: May 2002
|
Re: WANKING IS GOOD FOR YOU !
|
Fri, 18 July 2003 01:47
|
|
*phew*
|
|
|
I supported Toymods
Location: I renounced punctuation
Registered: May 2002
|
|
|
Registered: May 2003
|
Re: WANKING IS GOOD FOR YOU !
|
Fri, 18 July 2003 03:31
|
|
Jus was telling me about this last night, and i quote "I HAVE GREAT NEWS FOR ALL OF MANKIND"
ive also read that having sex 3 times a week reduces the chance of you getting a cold. Not sure if its true, but hell its a good enough reason, if you need one!
|
|
|
Location: Canberra
Registered: December 2002
|
|
|
I supported Toymods
Location: Epping, Sydney
Registered: May 2002
|
Re: ********* IS GOOD FOR YOU !
|
Sat, 19 July 2003 09:28
|
|
hehehe... a girl I know and I are of the exact same opinion (but not in the way you'd think). 45 minutes of exercise a day can easily be had without leaving the bedroom. Apparently it's an excellent cardio workout.
|
|
|
I supported Toymods
Location: Perth
Registered: May 2002
|
Re: ********* IS GOOD FOR YOU !
|
Sat, 19 July 2003 10:12
|
|
Hehe, I think you hit the nail on the head there Draven...
One thing though...why the hell has one of the moderators blocked out the word wanking?
|
|
|
I supported Toymods
Location: Epping, Sydney
Registered: May 2002
|
Re: ********* IS GOOD FOR YOU !
|
Sat, 19 July 2003 10:15
|
|
*shrugs*
so at a casual glance it's not seen I guess. once you click on the thread though... well lets say it definitly belongs here in the outhouse
|
|
|
Location: Bundaberg, Qld.
Registered: May 2002
|
Re: ********* IS GOOD FOR YOU !
|
Sun, 20 July 2003 10:05
|
|
justcallmefrank wrote on Sat, 19 July 2003 20:12 | One thing though...why the hell has one of the moderators blocked out the word wanking?
|
i think one of them has a problem with his own sexuality....
|
|
|
Location: GoldCoast/Brisbane
Registered: May 2002
|
Re: ********* IS GOOD FOR YOU !
|
Tue, 22 July 2003 07:13
|
|
Or maybe not gettin' enough?
|
|
|