Author | Topic |
Registered: August 2003
|
|
|

Location: Castle Hill, Sydney
Registered: January 2003
|
|
|

Location: Sydney
Registered: May 2002
|
Re: Which car is for me?
|
Fri, 22 August 2003 03:33

|
 |
Alternately an ae82 twin-cam would be cheaper to run but more likely to have been thrashed (potentially resulting in big maintenance costs).
I'd prefer a twin-cam just because where I live parking spaces are rare...
|
|
|
Registered: August 2003
|
Re: Which car is for me?
|
Fri, 22 August 2003 10:28

|
 |
Quote: | I'd prefer a twin-cam just because where I live parking spaces are rare...
|
ERR?!
|
|
|
Location: Brisbane, QLD
Registered: February 2003
|
Re: Which car is for me?
|
Fri, 22 August 2003 13:51

|
 |
MA61 supra
MK2's rule!!
I dont care if it fits your criteria...but the beer bottles sitting in front of me agree that i am right when i say this: MK2's fffffffffoooooooooorrrrrrrrreeeeeeeeeevvvvvvvvveee eeeeeeerrrrrrrrr
...that is all
|
|
|

Location: Eastern Sydney
Registered: May 2002
|
Re: Which car is for me?
|
Sun, 24 August 2003 11:42

|
 |
with a budget of $3500,you should look for an RA60. it's RWD so you can play at being a drifter,reliable,and in your price range.
parts are reasonably easy to come by as well.
Justin...
|
|
|

Location: Perth
Registered: November 2002
|
Re: Which car is for me?
|
Mon, 25 August 2003 02:30

|
 |
Its not in your age range but get an RA23. Everyone who doesn't have one deep down wants one. And if they say they don't they are just in denial
|
|
|

Location: Colac, Victoria
Registered: May 2002
|
Re: Which car is for me?
|
Mon, 25 August 2003 06:23
|
 |
letmedrift wrote on Fri, 22 August 2003 20:28 |
Quote: | I'd prefer a twin-cam just because where I live parking spaces are rare...
|
ERR?!
|
I agree - what the hell has twin cams got to do with parking spaces
gaddamn 
Anyway - cheap RWD - economical - anything 1970's corolla or celica would fir this bill
their fun cars to drive too - especially the ta22!
|
|
|