| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
sydney
Registered:
March 2003
|
|
2003 ZR celica Vs 2002 Nissan S15
|
Mon, 21 June 2004 01:00
|
 |
Hey guys!
A friend of mine is tossing between the 2003 ZR celica and 2002 Nissan S15
Both cars manual and around the same price
Can you guys give her your opinions and thoughts
thanks
|
|
|
Location:
Inside a giant turbo (syd...
Registered:
June 2002
|
|
Re: 2003 ZR celica Vs 2002 Nissan S15
|
Mon, 21 June 2004 01:19
|
|
|
s15. that is ofcourse if he wants to in time modify it
|
|
|
Location:
sydney
Registered:
March 2003
|
|
Re: 2003 ZR celica Vs 2002 Nissan S15
|
Mon, 21 June 2004 01:23
|
|
well no..
She just wants a nice car to drive and good resale value.
Reliable and a good all round car
|
|
|
Location:
Cabramatta, NSW
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: 2003 ZR celica Vs 2002 Nissan S15
|
Mon, 21 June 2004 01:41
|
|
| DacBietAE86 wrote on Mon, 21 June 2004 11:23 |
well no..
She just wants a nice car to drive and good resale value.
Reliable and a good all round car
|
Then get the Celica.
|
|
|
Location:
Canberra, ACT
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: 2003 ZR celica Vs 2002 Nissan S15
|
Mon, 21 June 2004 04:19
|
|
Definately the celica..
-Andrew
|
|
|
Location:
Brisbane
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: 2003 ZR celica Vs 2002 Nissan S15
|
Mon, 21 June 2004 04:54
|
|
I hate to say it, but the S15 is the pick of the pair if you want a performance car. The Celica is nice but lacking in useable power. You can't beat the midrange punch of a turbo engine!
Having said that, not everyone wants a fast car.
|
|
|
Location:
Cabramatta, NSW
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: 2003 ZR celica Vs 2002 Nissan S15
|
Mon, 21 June 2004 05:12
|
|
| Norbie wrote on Mon, 21 June 2004 14:54 |
I hate to say it, but the S15 is the pick of the pair if you want a performance car. The Celica is nice but lacking in useable power. You can't beat the midrange punch of a turbo engine!
|
Yes, very true, but he did also mention this:
| DacBietAE86 wrote on Mon, 21 June 2004 11:23 |
She just wants a nice car to drive and good resale value.
Reliable and a good all round car
|
|
|
|
Location:
Sydney
Registered:
March 2003
|
|
Re: 2003 ZR celica Vs 2002 Nissan S15
|
Mon, 21 June 2004 07:45
|
|
|
Celica for me
|
|
|
I supported Toymods
Location:
Perth
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: 2003 ZR celica Vs 2002 Nissan S15
|
Mon, 21 June 2004 08:54
|
|
|
Aside for the fact the S15 will always sound like a fart played backwards, it'd have to be my pick out of those two.
|
|
|
Location:
Melbourne
Registered:
August 2002
|
|
Re: 2003 ZR celica Vs 2002 Nissan S15
|
Mon, 28 June 2004 13:30
|
|
|
i am not exactly sure about the resale value, but i think a better performance car(S15) has more ppl sought after.
|
|
|
Banned user
Location:
Liverpool NSW
Registered:
March 2004
|
|
Re: 2003 ZR celica Vs 2002 Nissan S15
|
Mon, 28 June 2004 22:13
|
|
The resale value would problably have to got to the s15 althought the zr has better handling in the wet ff. Personally i dont think the zr should be that expensive, ive been in one and i thought the vvt was off but no, its just new cars a getting heavier and heavier.
The zr is problably more economical.
Take then both for a test drive, everyones got different tastes
|
|
|
