Author | Topic |

Location: sydney
Registered: May 2002
|
engine conversion legality???
|
Wed, 23 June 2004 17:16
|
 |
hi all.
was wondering if anyone could tell me if its legal to put a 1uz into a 240z.
or what the formula is to try and work it out.
stock stats as follows.
2393cc
1038kg
monocoque style chasis.
thanks
|
|
|

I supported Toymods Banned User
Location: Brisbane
Registered: May 2002
|
Re: engine conversion legality???
|
Wed, 23 June 2004 21:11

|
 |
For N/A: Tare Weight x3
1038kg x3 = 3.114L Max capicity.
|
|
|

Club Member
Location: sydney
Registered: May 2002
|
Re: engine conversion legality???
|
Wed, 23 June 2004 21:16

|
 |
should be ok as the 240 allready had a six in it, plus they weigh a ton!
sick of the cressi allready scrote
|
|
|

I supported Toymods
Location: Epping, Sydney
Registered: May 2002
|
Re: engine conversion legality???
|
Wed, 23 June 2004 22:46

|
 |
if they came factory with a 6-cyl engine, I *think* you use the higher conversion table
|
|
|

Location: Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Japan
Registered: January 2003
|
Re: engine conversion legality???
|
Wed, 23 June 2004 23:37

|
 |
|
|
|

Location: Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Japan
Registered: January 2003
|
Re: engine conversion legality???
|
Wed, 23 June 2004 23:39

|
 |
apparently you can put in a 5L!!
|
|
|

I supported Toymods
Location: Epping, Sydney
Registered: May 2002
|
Re: engine conversion legality???
|
Thu, 24 June 2004 00:11

|
 |
yep
I remember laughing about that with my old ra65 - could legally put a 5l into it 
I knew someone would save me the hassle of actually looking into it
since I should relaly be studying for my exams this afternoon
|
|
|

Location: Canberra
Registered: August 2003
|
Re: engine conversion legality???
|
Thu, 24 June 2004 11:57

|
 |
HAHA I pity the fool who wants to stroke his Dodge Viper!
1522Kg X 4.82 = 7336cc... theoretically he shouldnt have the 8L in there!
|
|
|

Location: sydney
Registered: May 2002
|
Re: engine conversion legality???
|
Sat, 26 June 2004 15:44

|
 |
ok im lost.
it says all veihicles originally having a four as the largest engine(so not this class)
but weighting less than 1100kg(which it does)
then the other one says
vehicles weighting more than 1100kg
shyould there not be another class thats vehicles under 1100kg with 6 and 8 cylinders as stock.
anyway im assuming that being under 1100kg the biggest i can go n/a is 3.1 like what cool1 said.
bummer
but a 1j will fit 
or should i go the 260z with the 1uz not as nice thou me thinks.
as for the cressi yeah sold that a while ago and been back into the ta22s.
just missing the power of the six thou
|
|
|

Location: Bottom of the hill, Sydney
Registered: April 2004
|
Re: engine conversion legality???
|
Sat, 26 June 2004 16:25

|
 |
If you read it correctly it says 4 cyl's and rotaries weighing over 1100kg, 6 cyl, 8 cyl and 12 cyl cars, meaning the weight restriction only applies to 4 cyl or rotary cars.
Meaning for mono constructed chasis with factory 6 cyl engine,
in cubic inches
original weight (1038kg) * 0.294 = 305 cu/i
or in millilitres
original weight (1038kg) * 4.82 = 5l
This is for na engine.
Brad
|
|
|

Location: sydney
Registered: May 2002
|
Re: engine conversion legality???
|
Sat, 26 June 2004 18:04

|
 |
sweet!! can have myself a turbo 1uz in a 1038kg shell.
|
|
|

Location: Brisbane
Registered: June 2003
|
Re: engine conversion legality???
|
Sun, 27 June 2004 08:12
|
 |
in NSW, a friend of family has a 5L windsor motor in a 1600gt capri...and its legal!
|
|
|