Author | Topic |
Location: Canberra
Registered: August 2003
|
What type of Battery for st185???
|
Thu, 26 August 2004 04:02
|
|
My battery is well and truly dead (bent cells driving around when alternator f@#$ed out), so i thought i would get my lift to work to drive me past battery world and pick one up. Problem is the battery listed in the Century catalog (apparently the bible of batteries) is about twice as big as what is in there. Was hoping to pick one up on the way home tonight, does anyone know what type of battery i am looking for?
It would be a huge benefit!!
|
|
|
I Supported Toymods
Location: Sydney
Registered: December 2002
|
|
|
Location: Colac, Victoria
Registered: May 2002
|
Re: What type of Battery for st185???
|
Thu, 26 August 2004 08:45
|
|
mines out of an EB falcon - nearly 400 cranking amps i think ( big bugger )
got to piss it off soon for a rearmounted sealed cell battery in the next month .. going a oddesy or one of those
|
|
|
I Supported Toymods
Location: Sydney
Registered: December 2002
|
Re: What type of Battery for st185???
|
Fri, 27 August 2004 05:25
|
|
All these ford batteries infecting our Gt4's
|
|
|
I supported Toymods
Location: Perth
Registered: May 2002
|
Re: What type of Battery for st185???
|
Fri, 27 August 2004 09:33
|
|
Hehe, I know its not an ST185, but mine is from a Commodore, 460CCA. Good buy, although I forgot to check if the terminals were right
|
|
|
Banned by his request
Location: moved to tamworth
Registered: July 2002
|
Re: What type of Battery for st185???
|
Fri, 27 August 2004 11:29
|
|
hahaha couldnt resist! get a 12 volt one!
get the same as you have(or close to its specs) or get a smaller odessey but they cost more.
mick
|
|
|
Location: Adelaide
Registered: April 2004
|
Re: What type of Battery for st185???
|
Fri, 27 August 2004 14:37
|
|
ive heard problems with odysey lately, breaking, and the australian dealer wasnt honouring warranty's......bloke that runs autobahn down here said
i got an optima.....nice dry cell, some stupidly high cold crank rating smaller than the original by a little.
|
|
|