Toymods Car Club
www.toymods.org.au
F.A.Q. F.A.Q.    Register Register    Login Login    Home Home
Members Members    Search Search
Toymods » Tech & Conversions » K-MAC v Noltec adjustable strut bearing plates

Show: Today's Posts  :: Show Polls 
Email to friend 
Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
AuthorTopic
SeptemberSquallIndustries
Forums Junkie


Location:
Melbourne
Registered:
August 2003
K-MAC v Noltec adjustable strut bearing plates Mon, 20 September 2004 08:33 Go to next message
Hi,

K-MAC are a big name but I've heard people talk down the K-MAC strut tops. Complaints like poor adjustment range, poor fit, poor durability.

Noltec do two different types of strut top; one with a polyeurethane insert and one with a plain metal sandwich plate. They're both the same price. The metal one is supposed to be used with spring rates over 300lb to prevent pounding on the compliant polyeurethane, but does it have a greater range of adjustment too?

Are either of those Noltec tops 'better' than the K-MAC tops? If so, why?

[Updated on: Mon, 20 September 2004 08:37]

  Send a private message to this user    
CLG
Forums Junkie


I supported Toymods

Location:
Perth, Western Australia
Registered:
December 2002
Re: K-MAC v Noltec adjustable strut bearing plates Mon, 20 September 2004 09:47 Go to previous messageGo to next message
My experience with both has been:

The KMAC's bend easily when the sturt bottoms out - if you have firmer springs and shocks this won't happen so eliminates the problem. The Noltecs are sturdier in my opinion and will take some degree of compression from the struts, but everyone has different ideas on suitable limits. Personally, I'd focus more on spring and shock suitability than Strut top, but this also leans away from the modern line of thinking of firmer sway bars, with softer springs and shocks, too.
  Send a private message to this user    
SeptemberSquallIndustries
Forums Junkie


Location:
Melbourne
Registered:
August 2003
Re: K-MAC v Noltec adjustable strut bearing plates Mon, 20 September 2004 11:36 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Quote:

Personally, I'd focus more on spring and shock suitability than Strut top, but this also leans away from the modern line of thinking of firmer sway bars, with softer springs and shocks, too.


Agreed. An adjustable strut top will allow correction of undesired camber resulting from said strut upgrade.

Thanks for your helpful input.
  Send a private message to this user    
ke382TG
Forums Junkie


Registered:
May 2002
Re: K-MAC v Noltec adjustable strut bearing plates Mon, 20 September 2004 23:53 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Here is what I wrote in another post last week about my experience with K-Mac strut tops:

"to answer your question, I have a set of K-mac adjustable tops and yes they do the job but I would not recommend them from my experience.

Mine had to be made specially, they were not kept in stock. They took 2 weeks to be made and when being fitted to the car the 3 mounting holes did not line up, strange considering they were meant to be made specifically for my car. A call was made to K-Mac, they assured they were the correct ones and that the 3 holes in the strut tower should just be filed out the extra 7mm or so to fit.

They have a very limited range of adjustment on my car (may be different on other vehicles) with 0.5 degrees negative camber being as much negative camber as I can get. I am using my original struts with coil overs, if I had used different struts with different stub axle angle I would be needing different strut tops most likely.

They didn't come with dust caps (old ones didn't fit either).

The bearing in the strut tops are already shagged after only about 4000km of driving.

When I asked why my kit didn't come with the dust caps for the tops via email I got no response. I spoke to them face to face at a car show and was given some bizarre story that got so far off track I ended up walking away (incidentally all the kits they had hanging up on display had the dust caps in them).

The fisnish quality is average and the accuracy of the placement of the centre mounting point surrounded by the urethane leaves a lot to be desired.

I hope this isn't portrayed as a pointless bagging of K-Mac, this is just my first hand experience, I am sure others have had a better time with them. Like I said though, they do the job, in an ugly sort of way."

Hope this is of use SSI.

[Updated on: Mon, 20 September 2004 23:56]

  Send a private message to this user    
SeptemberSquallIndustries
Forums Junkie


Location:
Melbourne
Registered:
August 2003
Re: K-MAC v Noltec adjustable strut bearing plates Tue, 21 September 2004 04:59 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Yes, and it's not the only time I've heard similar stories.
  Send a private message to this user    
CLG
Forums Junkie


I supported Toymods

Location:
Perth, Western Australia
Registered:
December 2002
Re: K-MAC v Noltec adjustable strut bearing plates Tue, 21 September 2004 05:22 Go to previous message
Yep basically, if I had the choice, I'd be going the Noltec items over KMAC, unfortunately, as I like KMAC springs and sway bars.
  Send a private message to this user    
  Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Previous Topic:pics of e52 centre
Next Topic:Import ST182/4/5's - Airbags in overseas models?
Goto Forum:
-=] Back to Top [=-

Current Time: Sat Nov 16 00:28:04 UTC 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.0068600177764893 seconds

Bandwidth utilization bar

.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Powered by: FUDforum 2.3.8
Copyright ©2001-2003 Advanced Internet Designs Inc.