| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
Sydney
Registered:
September 2003
|
|
|
Location:
Coffs Harbour, NSW
Registered:
November 2004
|
|
Re: TOUGH ta22
|
Mon, 28 March 2005 09:09
 
|
 |
 at the wing 
is it just me or is that thing hella low at the fron, but not the back? 
anyway, would be good without that stupid wing! 
|
|
|
Location:
Sydney
Registered:
April 2004
|
|
Re: TOUGH ta22
|
Mon, 28 March 2005 09:10
|
|
|
sorry but i just cant get past the fact he's stuck that wing on it,I wish people would understand that ta22s dont need a wing any wing zero nada..
|
|
|
Location:
Dandenong Ranges, VIC
Registered:
July 2004
|
|
Re: TOUGH ta22
|
Mon, 28 March 2005 10:03
|
|
i doubt you could get it much lower at the back with those bags on it, they're farkin huuuge!
The wing eats dick...
|
|
|
Location:
Sydney
Registered:
September 2003
|
|
Re: TOUGH ta22
|
Mon, 28 March 2005 10:06
|
|
There now doesnt that look better .
|
|
|
Location:
Brisbane
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: TOUGH ta22
|
Mon, 28 March 2005 11:19
|
|
Wing? That's a wang. 
|
|
|
Location:
Forster NSW
Registered:
September 2004
|
|
Re: TOUGH ta22
|
Mon, 28 March 2005 13:07
|
|
Needs to lose that cannon too.. could do with smaller wheels on the back and a lower ride height too, oh, and the sunshade thingy on the rear windscreen needs to go
The wing is a no brainer, take it off and burn it 
He's put an electric antenna on the rear left quarter panel too, that's half respectable at least (even if I prefer them hidden).
|
|
|
I supported Toymods
Location:
sydney.au
Registered:
August 2002
|
|
Re: TOUGH ta22
|
Mon, 28 March 2005 13:37
|
|
|
so nice. cept for the rice.
|
|
|
On Probation
Location:
sydney
Registered:
February 2005
|
|
Re: TOUGH ta22
|
Mon, 28 March 2005 13:39
|
|
|
needs that pimp deckage from the back otherwise ive creamed my pants
|
|
|
Location:
Sydney
Registered:
September 2003
|
|
Re: TOUGH ta22
|
Mon, 28 March 2005 13:42
|
|
| time2play wrote on Mon, 28 March 2005 23:39 |
needs that pimp deckage from the back otherwise ive creamed my pants
|
Yeah, if it was tubbed you could drop the back, but i like it up high it looks good like that  .
|
|
|
On Probation
Location:
sydney
Registered:
February 2005
|
|
Re: TOUGH ta22
|
Mon, 28 March 2005 13:58
|
|
looks not bad, my opinion id tub the shit out of it and throw it on the floor
and add a rexy scoop LOOOOOL sif man sif
|
|
|
Location:
Land of Oz
Registered:
June 2004
|
|
Re: TOUGH ta22
|
Mon, 28 March 2005 22:55
|
|
Hi,
It's okay, but he's gotta lose the wing. I'm not a big fan of cars being higher at the rear than the front, especially when it's way too low at the front. Lower the rear a bit or bring the front up a little higher.
There's only one classic Celica that looks more stupid with a rear wing than a TA22/RA23, and that's the RA28/25 and TA27 series liftbacks. These cars already have the small lip on the rear section and a rear wing/spoiler looks really stupid - even the proper Toyota ones.
seeyuzz
river
|
|
|
Location:
Glenwood, Sydney
Registered:
April 2004
|
|
Re: TOUGH ta22
|
Tue, 29 March 2005 10:31
|
|
|
Do not like it at all!!!
|
|
|
Location:
Brisbane
Registered:
August 2003
|
|
Re: TOUGH ta22
|
Tue, 29 March 2005 11:58
|
|
|
Thats a shocking wing. He could have done a better job with the antenna too. A VT/VS (or Lexcen) power antenna should fit nicely in the front guard just behind the wheel, and they mount nice and flush with the surface. No bulge sticking out the top or side.
|
|
|
Location:
Sydney
Registered:
September 2003
|
|
|
