| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
Sydney
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
LIberty 3.0R-B Vs Bora 2.8 4motion
|
Sat, 11 June 2005 14:04
|
 |
Both cars are AWD, 6speed manual, similar power/wieght ratio, similar quater mile times, both are 6cyl, and similar weight.
Which car would do better lap times at the creek?
Justify your reasoning?
|
|
|
Location:
Campbelltown
Registered:
November 2003
|
|
Re: LIberty 3.0R-B Vs Bora 2.8 4motion
|
Sun, 12 June 2005 01:30
|
|
|
bora 4 motion is slow, it has alright stats but does not translate into real world figures, get the liberty better car.
|
|
|
Location:
Campbelltown
Registered:
November 2003
|
|
Re: LIberty 3.0R-B Vs Bora 2.8 4motion
|
Sun, 12 June 2005 01:35
|
|
|
why not the liberty Gt in manual, its a very nice car, or you not a fan of turbo's but for the same price as the six it is an awesome package
|
|
|
Location:
Canberra
Registered:
August 2003
|
|
Re: LIberty 3.0R-B Vs Bora 2.8 4motion
|
Sun, 12 June 2005 08:45
|
|
Liberty any day, will hold its value better over time too. As for RB vs GT, to be honest i'd take the RB any day over the GT. Although it's slower, you get the STI 6-speed, 18inch alloys standard and bilstien suspension, it's a lot nicer to drive, and the sound of the new H6 engine at full noise is almost orgasmic, it's $1000 cheaper than a GT, looks better, and insurance companies dont rape you for having a turbo...
My 2c
|
|
|
I supported Toymods
Location:
Perth
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: LIberty 3.0R-B Vs Bora 2.8 4motion
|
Sun, 12 June 2005 08:53
|
|
Liberty, because it has a REAL 4WD setup. I'd definetly take the RB over the GT, unless I was really concerned about the slightly higher fuel useage or I only drove in straight lines 
|
|
|
