Toymods Car Club
www.toymods.org.au
F.A.Q. F.A.Q.    Register Register    Login Login    Home Home
Members Members    Search Search
Toymods » General Car Talk » Twin Turbo 3.4L V6 MR2

Show: Today's Posts  :: Show Polls 
Email to friend 
Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
AuthorTopic
terra
Regular


Registered:
July 2005
Twin Turbo 3.4L V6 MR2 Tue, 23 August 2005 17:48 Go to next message
lol nice

http://bulldog.unca.edu/~jmpersek/public_html/gt34 00.html

[Updated on: Tue, 23 August 2005 17:49]

  Send a private message to this user    
ra23mad
Forums Junkie


Location:
Adelaide
Registered:
September 2003
 
Re: Twin Turbo 3.4L V6 MR2 Tue, 23 August 2005 23:35 Go to previous messageGo to next message
personally - I dont know why you'd use a 3.4l from a 4runner...

the 3sgte is capable of SOOO MUCH......*shrug* guess it's to be unique.
  Send a private message to this user    
justcallmefrank
Forums Junkie


I supported Toymods

Location:
Perth
Registered:
May 2002
 
Re: Twin Turbo 3.4L V6 MR2 Wed, 24 August 2005 00:03 Go to previous messageGo to next message
ra23mad wrote on Wed, 24 August 2005 07:35

the 3sgte is capable of SOOO MUCH......*shrug* guess it's to be unique.

There is no real replacement for displacement, you may say turbochargers, but he has them too Razz

One question I raise is though...is that an iron block engine!?
  Send a private message to this user    
Norbie
Forums Junkie


Location:
Brisbane
Registered:
May 2002
Re: Twin Turbo 3.4L V6 MR2 Wed, 24 August 2005 00:20 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Yes it is.
  Send a private message to this user    
justcallmefrank
Forums Junkie


I supported Toymods

Location:
Perth
Registered:
May 2002
 
Re: Twin Turbo 3.4L V6 MR2 Wed, 24 August 2005 00:34 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Norbie wrote on Wed, 24 August 2005 08:20

Yes it is.

Eww, why didn't he just get a V6 Camry engine, almost as big, much lighter though, would've helped his handling no end.
  Send a private message to this user    
terra
Regular


Registered:
July 2005
Re: Twin Turbo 3.4L V6 MR2 Wed, 24 August 2005 01:25 Go to previous messageGo to next message
because camry engiens are iron block too

but we have alloy heads (or newer ones do -- same as that 5VZ-F(T)E.
  Send a private message to this user    
justcallmefrank
Forums Junkie


I supported Toymods

Location:
Perth
Registered:
May 2002
 
Re: Twin Turbo 3.4L V6 MR2 Wed, 24 August 2005 01:27 Go to previous messageGo to next message
No, the current 1MZ Camry engines are all-alloy. At least they are here.
  Send a private message to this user    
terra
Regular


Registered:
July 2005
Re: Twin Turbo 3.4L V6 MR2 Wed, 24 August 2005 01:33 Go to previous messageGo to next message
the thing is, the USA seems to have problems getting 3S-GTE's for some reason.. youll find more 3.0L V6 and 5SFE Turbo's in MR2's over there.
  Send a private message to this user    
Caledwvech
Forums Junkie


Location:
Sydney
Registered:
June 2003
 
Re: Twin Turbo 3.4L V6 MR2 Wed, 24 August 2005 07:09 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Looks really nice though. I like it.
  Send a private message to this user    
Daemon
Regular


Location:
New Zealand
Registered:
May 2004
Re: Twin Turbo 3.4L V6 MR2 Wed, 24 August 2005 07:21 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ahhh you guys are so last week. Here in NZ, they are fitting a 1UZFE into an AW11! Im sure its been posted here before.

I do however like final paint idea, very itdy.
  Send a private message to this user    
Spanktown
Forums Junkie


Location:
Inside a giant turbo (syd...
Registered:
June 2002
 
Re: Twin Turbo 3.4L V6 MR2 Wed, 24 August 2005 07:22 Go to previous messageGo to next message
haha 1uz... bill strong is now turboing his 4.6 litre northstar with a t04....
  Send a private message to this user    
4agte
Forums Junkie


Location:
Toronto, Downtown
Registered:
September 2004
Re: Twin Turbo 3.4L V6 MR2 Wed, 24 August 2005 07:57 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Spanktown wrote on Wed, 24 August 2005 17:22

haha 1uz... bill strong is now turboing his 4.6 litre northstar with a t04....

Shocked Shocked Shocked

its going to be an animal you have to do something really special to stay ahead of bill strong Laughing Laughing
  Send a private message to this user    
Joshstix
Forums Junkie


Toymods Vice President

Location:
Sydney
Registered:
May 2002
Re: Twin Turbo 3.4L V6 MR2 Wed, 24 August 2005 08:02 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Back to the alloy V iron debate. The 1MZ is a really weak engine compared to the iron block V6's. The rods are a lot weaker and the pistons aren't nearly as substantial. In short if you're going to go forced induction an MZ would really need rods and pistons.

As to why do it, well sure the 3S can maje huge power but it's not going to get close to the low end torque of this thing. Horses for courses really. I'm building a 3SGTE that I don't expect to hit full boost until 4500rpm, but I'm happy with that. This customer wanted the grunt from down low so he made his choices. I tell you what though the twin turbo 3400 would feel a hell of a lot tougher than any 3S on the street.
  Send a private message to this user    
dingaling
Forums Junkie


Location:
tas
Registered:
June 2002
Re: Twin Turbo 3.4L V6 MR2 Wed, 24 August 2005 10:55 Go to previous messageGo to next message
I think in the Mr2 with the 3s would feel tougher. Bieng in a light car and the way it makes power, more likely to have better traction.

[Updated on: Wed, 24 August 2005 11:05]

  Send a private message to this user    
towe_001
Forums Junkie


Location:
Somewhere on a dirt bowl ...
Registered:
August 2004
Re: Twin Turbo 3.4L V6 MR2 Wed, 24 August 2005 12:21 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Here check this one out
V6MR2
The dude does a full right up on his Mk1

Quote:

To quote a line from "Jaws"- "we're gonna need a bigger boat!"


He also does a "big brake" conversion. Not fussed on how he does the calipers but Shocked
click here, please

But i guess if its done right......
  Send a private message to this user    
terra
Regular


Registered:
July 2005
Re: Twin Turbo 3.4L V6 MR2 Wed, 24 August 2005 12:52 Go to previous messageGo to next message
heres a built 1MZ iwth a T66 and custom EMS(?) ECU

http://www.toyotanation.com/forum/t93601.html
  Send a private message to this user    
Gwaijaitat
Regular


Location:
Sydney
Registered:
April 2005
Re: Twin Turbo 3.4L V6 MR2 Wed, 24 August 2005 16:09 Go to previous messageGo to next message
basically they r trying to build a ferrari or nsx
  Send a private message to this user    
terra
Regular


Registered:
July 2005
Re: Twin Turbo 3.4L V6 MR2 Wed, 24 August 2005 16:25 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Gwaijaitat wrote on Thu, 25 August 2005 01:39

basically they r trying to build a ferrari or nsx


theyre making it look like the JGTC GT300 entrants.
  Send a private message to this user    
4agte
Forums Junkie


Location:
Toronto, Downtown
Registered:
September 2004
Re: Twin Turbo 3.4L V6 MR2 Wed, 24 August 2005 23:23 Go to previous messageGo to next message
dingaling wrote on Wed, 24 August 2005 20:55

I think in the Mr2 with the 3s would feel tougher. Bieng in a light car and the way it makes power, more likely to have better traction.

MR2's dont really have issues with traction like f/r and f/f cars do...
with a lump of iron like that im sure it would aid traction Laughing
I wouldnt mind doing a conversion like this looks alot more appealing than a 3sgte sw20 and he has gone about his i/c location in a very similar way to how i have alltho the i/c piping is a bit ghetto and i dont like the way he has just cut big holes but i guess its not finnished yet
  Send a private message to this user    
h3ff44
Forums Junkie


Location:
melbourne
Registered:
February 2005
Re: Twin Turbo 3.4L V6 MR2 Thu, 25 August 2005 00:34 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Daemon wrote on Wed, 24 August 2005 17:21

Ahhh you guys are so last week. Here in NZ, they are fitting a 1UZFE into an AW11! Im sure its been posted here before.

I do however like final paint idea, very itdy.


yeah ive seen that... was awesome, tight fit and had to have more air dams added to get air flow to motor.. ahaha
  Send a private message to this user    
thechuckster
Forums Junkie


Location:
Brisbane
Registered:
February 2003
 
Re: Twin Turbo 3.4L V6 MR2 Thu, 25 August 2005 03:44 Go to previous messageGo to next message
dumn question prossibly, but what gearbox/bellhousing would go behind a camry V6 to enable you to run it in a RWD car?

something from a 4wd?

am not contemplating it personally, just curious as there was a v6 camry wagon at wacol ABC with the engine mostly intact and it did look reasonably short and not extremely wide.

cheers,
Charles.
  Send a private message to this user    
Corona RT142
Forums Junkie


Location:
Campbelltown
Registered:
November 2003
Re: Twin Turbo 3.4L V6 MR2 Thu, 25 August 2005 03:50 Go to previous messageGo to next message
camry box, remember being mid ship mounted its literally a fwd setup mounted in the rear of the car. its a east-west mount not north-south.

[Updated on: Thu, 25 August 2005 03:50]

  Send a private message to this user    
4agte
Forums Junkie


Location:
Toronto, Downtown
Registered:
September 2004
Re: Twin Turbo 3.4L V6 MR2 Thu, 25 August 2005 04:06 Go to previous messageGo to next message
edit: got confused between diff ppl

[Updated on: Thu, 25 August 2005 04:07]

  Send a private message to this user    
thechuckster
Forums Junkie


Location:
Brisbane
Registered:
February 2003
 
Re: Twin Turbo 3.4L V6 MR2 Thu, 25 August 2005 04:20 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Corona RT142 wrote on Thu, 25 August 2005 13:50

camry box, remember being mid ship mounted its literally a fwd setup mounted in the rear of the car. its a east-west mount not north-south.

i know that... i was wondering how/if the engine could be run in a RWD (north-south) configuration? much the same way people stuff an east-west 3sgte into north-south TA/RA2x's.
  Send a private message to this user    
Corona RT142
Forums Junkie


Location:
Campbelltown
Registered:
November 2003
Re: Twin Turbo 3.4L V6 MR2 Thu, 25 August 2005 04:21 Go to previous messageGo to next message
ahhh now i get you no idea.
  Send a private message to this user    
Joshstix
Forums Junkie


Toymods Vice President

Location:
Sydney
Registered:
May 2002
Re: Twin Turbo 3.4L V6 MR2 Thu, 25 August 2005 05:18 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Well the guys putting V6's in SW20's use the E153 which is the standard box with the 3SGTE. I'd assume that any of the gearboxes commonly used to make a 3S front rear would work. A nice little RS200 6 speed would be my pick behind a 1MZ-FE in a light car.
  Send a private message to this user    
terra
Regular


Registered:
July 2005
Re: Twin Turbo 3.4L V6 MR2 Thu, 25 August 2005 05:35 Go to previous messageGo to next message
thechuckster wrote on Thu, 25 August 2005 13:50

Corona RT142 wrote on Thu, 25 August 2005 13:50

camry box, remember being mid ship mounted its literally a fwd setup mounted in the rear of the car. its a east-west mount not north-south.

i know that... i was wondering how/if the engine could be run in a RWD (north-south) configuration? much the same way people stuff an east-west 3sgte into north-south TA/RA2x's.




the 3VZ was orginally a RWD engine (for the FWD set up they run an oil relocation kit to clear the FWD engine mount locations)

you could use a Hilux box probably to run it in a N-S config
  Send a private message to this user    
Norbie
Forums Junkie


Location:
Brisbane
Registered:
May 2002
Re: Twin Turbo 3.4L V6 MR2 Thu, 25 August 2005 06:05 Go to previous messageGo to next message
R154 with a R151 (Hilux) bellhousing = RWD setup for VZ engine.
  Send a private message to this user    
JustenGT4
Forums Junkie


Location:
Canberra
Registered:
June 2003
Re: Twin Turbo 3.4L V6 MR2 Thu, 25 August 2005 22:10 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Hmmm iron block V6 in MR2 = spin machine in my book. Nice engineering but the weight is gonna kill handling....they are taily enough as it is and with that weight swinging around it'll be uncatchable.

As for force inducting the 1MZ, no probs there at all. You could easily achieve 400hp flywheel with more torque than you could use safe as houses...i wouldn't crack the engine open until 500hp had been passed. Much lighter and look at the perf of Brad Bedell (?) beast. If those yanks could tune them his original setup would have lasted just fine Smile
  Send a private message to this user    
terra
Regular


Registered:
July 2005
Re: Twin Turbo 3.4L V6 MR2 Fri, 26 August 2005 00:44 Go to previous messageGo to next message
1MZ rods seem to go with anything over 300hp (theyre small like a pinky finger)... which isnt hte case with the 3vz but too bad the 3vz had paper thin pistons Sad
  Send a private message to this user    
mr2greasemonkey
Newcomer


Location:
Portland, Oregon
Registered:
August 2005
Re: Twin Turbo 3.4L V6 MR2 Fri, 26 August 2005 05:23 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Awww dang! You here too! haha. I'm internet stalking you man! 5vz rocks! Gonna be stomp'n the 3sgte's here real soon,hehehe.
  Send a private message to this user    
4agte
Forums Junkie


Location:
Toronto, Downtown
Registered:
September 2004
Re: Twin Turbo 3.4L V6 MR2 Fri, 26 August 2005 05:32 Go to previous messageGo to next message
mr2greasemonkey wrote on Fri, 26 August 2005 15:23

Awww dang! You here too! haha. I'm internet stalking you man! 5vz rocks! Gonna be stomp'n the 3sgte's here real soon,hehehe.

so thats your car in the video???
  Send a private message to this user    
mr2greasemonkey
Newcomer


Location:
Portland, Oregon
Registered:
August 2005
Re: Twin Turbo 3.4L V6 MR2 Fri, 26 August 2005 05:36 Go to previous message
Nopes, not me. But i do know the guy that own it. Let's just say he and I are on the similiar paths, heeeh!
  Send a private message to this user    
  Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Previous Topic:spark plug lead warranty
Next Topic:second hand tyres?
Goto Forum:
-=] Back to Top [=-

Current Time: Thu Mar 28 16:59:37 UTC 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.006929874420166 seconds

Bandwidth utilization bar

.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Powered by: FUDforum 2.3.8
Copyright ©2001-2003 Advanced Internet Designs Inc.