| Author | Topic |
|---|
I supported Toymods
Location:
Toodyay, WA
Registered:
July 2002
|
 TA22
|
Thu, 26 December 2002 01:05
|
 |
Is this what all TA22' should have??
|
|
|
I supported Toymods
Banned User
Location:
Brisbane
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: TA22
|
Thu, 26 December 2002 01:32
|
|
|
Do you mean is that the engine that TA22's come with stock? In this case the answer is no!
|
|
|
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: TA22
|
Thu, 26 December 2002 05:44
|
|
hey that shouldn't be there!!
looks like an early 18RG, 2L DOHC. hate to get pulled over with one of these puppies in your bay, but would be fun.
to answer your question, no, all TA22s should have a 3TGTE 
|
|
|
Banned member
Location:
Brisbane
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: TA22
|
Thu, 26 December 2002 05:47
|
|
|
looks to me like an early 2tg, 1600 twin cam
|
|
|
I supported Toymods
Banned User
Location:
Brisbane
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: TA22
|
Thu, 26 December 2002 06:19
|
|
Shouldn't it be stamped on the side of the block??? 
|
|
|
I supported Toymods
Location:
Toodyay, WA
Registered:
July 2002
|
|
Re: TA22
|
Thu, 26 December 2002 08:40
|
|
Its a 18R-GU
and yea its fun 
but not very legal... 
|
|
|
Banned member
Location:
Brisbane
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: TA22
|
Thu, 26 December 2002 10:26
|
|
doh !...i should have known by the top radiator hose on the other side
why isnt it legal ?
in qld it is about power to weight ratio, im sure a 18rg wouldnt be that illegal considering i have seen 327 chevs and even a 351 in toranas !
|
|
|
Location:
Sydney
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: TA22
|
Thu, 26 December 2002 10:30
|
|
|
I dont see how an 18-RG isnt legal ?
|
|
|
I supported Toymods
Location:
Toodyay, WA
Registered:
July 2002
|
|
Re: TA22
|
Thu, 26 December 2002 12:01
|
|
umm, there is a little thing about a car being engineered that makes the all the difference...
this car is not engineered
CamZH
|
|
|
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: TA22
|
Thu, 26 December 2002 12:03
|
|
and the dizzy mounted on the block gives it away.
18RGs can be engineered in a TA22, but as they were meant for RA2x the TA22 is too small, hence brake upgrades etc would be required for the extra 25% engine size.
|
|
|
Location:
Sydney
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: TA22
|
Thu, 26 December 2002 13:34
|
|
Ahh right yes obviously
but i got the impression u were saying its not legal as in not engineerable ....
all good
|
|
|
