| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
sydney
Registered:
August 2003
|
|
|
Location:
eastern suburbs, melbourne
Registered:
March 2005
|
|
Re: seca SX cheaper than corolla SX?
|
Wed, 05 October 2005 23:27
 
|
 |
yeah the seca is ugly. and it looks girly, thats the main reason for it being cheaper. IMHO
|
|
|
Location:
Adelaide
Registered:
September 2003
|
|
Re: seca SX cheaper than corolla SX?
|
Thu, 06 October 2005 06:14
|
|
|
How many ae92 SX hatchs do see around the place compared with SX Secas?
|
|
|
Banned by his request
Location:
moved to tamworth
Registered:
July 2002
|
|
Re: seca SX cheaper than corolla SX?
|
Thu, 06 October 2005 07:24
|
|
i prefur the look of the sx seca by far!but im biased!
mine can even go under water its that good!
mick
|
|
|
Location:
Sydney
Registered:
September 2003
|
|
Re: seca SX cheaper than corolla SX?
|
Thu, 06 October 2005 07:37
|
|
hatch = handbag
seca = shopping trolley
the back can be sexy just needs to be lowered a little bit 
really to answer your question there shouldn't be any reason that one should be more expensive than the other. i'm just assuming that the hatch is sought after by more people so they hold a higher price.
other than the back the front is also different, headlights, grille and bumper. interior is identical as far as i know.
|
|
|
Banned by his request
Location:
moved to tamworth
Registered:
July 2002
|
|
|
I Supported Toymods
Location:
Nthn Beaches, Sydney
Registered:
October 2004
|
|
Re: seca SX cheaper than corolla SX?
|
Thu, 06 October 2005 12:56
|
|
Any excuse to post a picture aye finney??
I think the hatches are getting a bit rarer on the ground these days, also maybe cause they're lighter (for the racer wannabes)?
Nah, i'm pretty sure its just cause they look better
GT
|
|
|
Location:
Sydney
Registered:
September 2003
|
|
Re: seca SX cheaper than corolla SX?
|
Thu, 06 October 2005 14:44
|
|
yeah what can i say 
finally got a digital camera and i'm making good use of it hahahaha meh just trying to prove that the seca can also look the goods
|
|
|
