Author | Topic |
Location: Sydney NSW
Registered: December 2002
|
|
|
Location: Brisbane
Registered: May 2002
|
Re: Falcon BA Crash
|
Sun, 09 February 2003 14:33
|
|
Shit hey!
Cheers
Wilbo
|
|
|
I supported Toymods
Location: South of Wollongong
Registered: May 2002
|
Re: Falcon BA Crash
|
Mon, 10 February 2003 04:24
|
|
that second pic is a killer!!
any ideas what happened??
|
|
|
Location: Brisbane, QLD, Australia
Registered: May 2002
|
Re: Falcon BA Crash
|
Mon, 10 February 2003 05:27
|
|
Classic T-Bone.
|
|
|
Location: Brisbane
Registered: May 2002
|
Re: Falcon BA Crash
|
Mon, 10 February 2003 05:45
|
|
point being?
|
|
|
Location: Brisbane, QLD, Australia
Registered: May 2002
|
Re: Falcon BA Crash
|
Mon, 10 February 2003 12:53
|
|
turbokid wrote on Mon, 10 February 2003 15:45 | point being?
|
Ummm, that that's what happened?
|
|
|
Location: Sydney, Australia
Registered: May 2002
|
Re: Falcon BA Crash
|
Mon, 10 February 2003 23:18
|
|
A few years ago I saw a falcon similar to that one.. except the B pillar was only about 15cm away from the opposite B pillar.. yep, seats and all compressed into a 15cm space.. can't see how the driver could have survived...
|
|
|
Location: Sydney NSW
Registered: December 2002
|
Re: Falcon BA Crash
|
Tue, 11 February 2003 00:14
|
|
it still looks like the glass isn't broken much at all
|
|
|
Location: Brisbane
Registered: May 2002
|
Re: Falcon BA Crash
|
Tue, 11 February 2003 06:36
|
|
refering to the post not your comment apollo
|
|
|
Location: Brisbane, QLD, Australia
Registered: May 2002
|
Re: Falcon BA Crash
|
Tue, 11 February 2003 11:01
|
|
turbokid wrote on Tue, 11 February 2003 16:36 | refering to the post not your comment apollo
|
Oh ok.
I think the real thing was, even though it was only a falcon, it only had 300km's on it. Much too soon for any car. Well... there definatly are some excuses that are my opinion though. Non-Toyota ones of course.
|
|
|