| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
Sydney, Australia
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
technically it's not a car, so I'll post it here
|
Tue, 08 July 2003 02:35
|
 |
The Viper-powered Dodge Tomahawk concept vehicle shatters all the barriers of conventional thinking about personal transportation. This four-wheel, single-passenger vehicle is a sleek, rolling sculpture that combines art-deco styling with extreme engineering. The 500-horsepower Viper V-10 engine powering the dual rear wheels gives this radical vehicle a potential top speed of nearly 400 miles per hour - for anyone who wants to test it. The Tomahawk roared into public view at the North American International Auto Show.
Initial reaction to the concept vehicle typically comes in two words: 'Wow' and 'why.' The 'wow' is easy to understand from Dodge, the brand that continues to drive its foot to the floor - most recently with the all-new 2003 Viper, Heavy Duty and Light Duty Rams and an SRT lineup dedicated to engineering the most powerful production vehicles in their segments. But 'why' would a company, famous for its innovative car and truck designs, go down this particular path?
The Dodge Tomahawk is a Chrysler Group design concept that is as much a Viper-powered work of art as it is a whole new type of vehicle invention. It is both a sculpture that can be ridden, as well as a bold statement about the Chrysler Group's enthusiast culture and passion for design.
|
|
|
| | Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|
 |
technically it's not a car, so I'll post it here
|
Sam | Tue, 08 July 2003 02:35 |
|
Re: technically it's not a car, so I'll post it here
|
ed_ma61 | Tue, 08 July 2003 02:39 |
|
Re: technically it's not a car, so I'll post it here
|
RobST162 | Tue, 08 July 2003 02:39 |
|
Re: technically it's not a car, so I'll post it here
|
Classique71 | Tue, 08 July 2003 10:59 |
|
Re: technically it's not a car, so I'll post it here
|
ehendrikd | Tue, 08 July 2003 03:05 |
|
Re: technically it's not a car, so I'll post it here
|
Lucid | Tue, 08 July 2003 08:11 |
|
Re: technically it's not a car, so I'll post it here
|
draven | Tue, 08 July 2003 08:54 |
|
Re: technically it's not a car, so I'll post it here
|
lang | Tue, 08 July 2003 09:05 |
|
Re: technically it's not a car, so I'll post it here
|
draven | Tue, 08 July 2003 09:07 |
|
Re: technically it's not a car, so I'll post it here
|
manipulate | Tue, 08 July 2003 09:15 |
|
Re: technically it's not a car, so I'll post it here
|
lang | Tue, 08 July 2003 09:16 |
|
Re: technically it's not a car, so I'll post it here
|
Rolla Boy | Tue, 08 July 2003 10:25 |
|
Re: technically it's not a car, so I'll post it here
|
swankiedude | Tue, 08 July 2003 11:48 |
|
Re: technically it's not a car, so I'll post it here
|
Shteeve | Wed, 09 July 2003 03:20 |
|
Re: technically it's not a car, so I'll post it here
|
Flem | Wed, 09 July 2003 10:03 |
|
Re: technically it's not a car, so I'll post it here
|
gtman | Mon, 14 July 2003 07:49 |
|
Re: technically it's not a car, so I'll post it here
|
speakafreaka | Mon, 14 July 2003 11:49 |
| Current Time:
Thu Jun 13 17:49:55 UTC 2024 |
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.0035398006439209 seconds |
